Multiple identities, multiple-discrimination: A critical review

Abstract

The concept of multiple-discrimination, particularly as found in the labor market, is fast becoming common parlance among policy-making circles. Understanding discrimination is no longer about uncovering simple and dualistic links between two social groups: it is increasingly apparent that the nature and dynamics of discrimination are complex because the multiple positions occupied by people are shaped by numerous social attributes. Economic theory and economists, however, have hardly addressed issues of multiple-discrimination or intersectional discrimination. By surveying the economics literature, from orthodoxy to heterodoxy, this article shows how economists are lagging behind legal and human rights theorists in tackling the issue. A couple of contemporary cases from the UK, those of Aishah Azmi and Nadia Eweida, are used in this largely critical literature survey to show the value of utilizing a multiple-discrimination framework to acknowledge the complexities and nuances of labor market reality.Intersectional analysis, labor market discrimination, multiple identities, religion, heterodox and orthodox economics, JEL Codes: B5, K, Z1,

Is There a Double‐Negative Effect? Gender and Ethnic Wage Differentials in Italy

“…Scholars have emphasized that discrimination in the labour market is based not only on the dichotomy between two groups, but also on several social attributes that shape the multiple identity of the individual (Ruwanpura, ). In this framework, multiple discrimination refers mainly to the cumulative negative effects of diverse social positions, such as race and gender for migrant women (Brewer et al ., ).…”

The Snowballing Penalty Effect: Multiple Disadvantage and Pay

“…Social relations of discrimination are more complex and based in multiple, intersecting and interlaced interactions (Bagilhole, 2009) between and within disadvantaged groups. Scholars have long argued that, by reducing experiences to a forced alignment with one or more single identities of disadvantage, the additive approach to discrimination fails to capture the way in which identities may be transformed when interacting with another (Anthias and Yuval-Davis, 1993;Ruwanpura, 2008;Williams, 1989). The key concept here is that of 'intersectionality' (Bagilhole, 2009).…”

Can Religious Affiliation Explain the Disadvantage of Muslim Women in the British Labour Market?

“…They also cannot be treated as a homogeneous group as issues of race, ethnicity, migration and class are of great importance in understanding their multiple identities as well as experience in the UK labour market (Brah, 1993;Ruwanpura, 2008). In this context, Muslim women occupy multiple positions and identities that are complex and multi-directional.…”