2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2022.108818
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple health indicators fusion-based health prognostic for lithium-ion battery using transfer learning and hybrid deep learning method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) technology, especially that focused on big data analysis, has made substantial advancements in numerous fields. Among such technology, deep learning methods have considerably influenced big data analysis and feature extraction, thereby garnering the interest of many researchers in the realm of HI construction [11][12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) technology, especially that focused on big data analysis, has made substantial advancements in numerous fields. Among such technology, deep learning methods have considerably influenced big data analysis and feature extraction, thereby garnering the interest of many researchers in the realm of HI construction [11][12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has resulted in more accurate estimates of the remaining life of the battery, reducing maintenance costs and the risk of system failure [16]. Emerging techniques, such as transfer learning and self-supervised learning, are applied to lithium battery RUL prediction to provide better prediction performance with limited data [17]. Various deep learning models, such as convolutional neural network (CNN), and recurrent neural network [18], long short-term memory network (LSTM) [19], and transformer [20], are utilized to learn the complex relationship between battery state and RUL.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed method achieved an accuracy improvement of at least 5% compared to conventional LSTM methods on their laboratory dataset. Ma et al 30 . combined deep belief network and LSTM to develop SOH estimation model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed method achieved an accuracy improvement of at least 5% compared to conventional LSTM methods on their laboratory dataset. Ma et al 30 combined deep belief network and LSTM to develop SOH estimation model. Measured health indicators (HIs) such as the charging time of CC charging process, charging voltage change in the equal time interval, the time reaching to the temperature peak during discharging process, as well as calculated HIs including peak value and location of IC curves and sample entropy of discharge voltage, were used as inputs to developed SOH estimation model after applying joint distribution adaption algorithm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%