2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10845-017-1357-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple failure behaviors identification and remaining useful life prediction of ball bearings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, if all these features have been taken as input parameters to the model, then it may result into model over-fitting. Thus, before using these features as input parameters to the model, it is desirable to select the most sensitive features from the feature set and remove the less indicative features to improve the model accuracy [44].…”
Section: Construction Of Bearing Degradation Indicator Setmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, if all these features have been taken as input parameters to the model, then it may result into model over-fitting. Thus, before using these features as input parameters to the model, it is desirable to select the most sensitive features from the feature set and remove the less indicative features to improve the model accuracy [44].…”
Section: Construction Of Bearing Degradation Indicator Setmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Time-domain analysis is based directly on the temporal waveform itself. The characteristics usually extracted from these signals are mean square root (RMS), peak value (PV), kurtosis (KT), and crest factor (CF) [ 32 , 33 ]. These statistical characteristics reveal the signal’s energy intensity, which may reveal a change of friction in CDFW.…”
Section: Vibration Signal Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods built the mapping from condition monitoring data to RUL values directly without prior knowledge. Some experiments show that the degradation process consists of gradual and sudden changes (Son et al, 2014;Kundu et al, 2019). The RUL prediction has to consider the degradation process of equipment in response to the uncertain influence of sudden changes, such as Zhang et al (2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%