2016
DOI: 10.1109/tsp.2015.2505683
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple Extended Target Tracking With Labeled Random Finite Sets

Abstract: Abstract-Targets that generate multiple measurements at a given instant in time are commonly known as extended targets. These present a challenge for many tracking algorithms, as they violate one of the key assumptions of the standard measurement model. In this paper, a new algorithm is proposed for tracking multiple extended targets in clutter, that is capable of estimating the number of targets, as well the trajectories of their states, comprising the kinematics, measurement rates and extents. The proposed t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
166
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 191 publications
(181 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
166
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, they are distributed according to the Poisson RFS [39] g C with intensity function κ(z) = λ C p C (z). Using these assumptions, the likelihood of obtaining a set of measurements from a given multi-object state is [37]…”
Section: Multi-object Likelihood Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, they are distributed according to the Poisson RFS [39] g C with intensity function κ(z) = λ C p C (z). Using these assumptions, the likelihood of obtaining a set of measurements from a given multi-object state is [37]…”
Section: Multi-object Likelihood Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, scenarios involving, for example, extended concave targets [76] might still cause confusion. Although ad-hoc solutions that take into consideration the expected size and concavity of the targets could be employed to overcome this limitation, a more principled solution would be to utilize RFS-based extended target tracking approaches such as proposed in [77] while taking into account the expected distribution of the extended targets in the computation of the ILH.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, scenarios involving, for example, extended concave targets [77] might still cause confusion. Although ad hoc solutions that take into consideration the expected size and concavity of the targets could be employed to overcome this limitation, a more principled solution would be to utilize RFS-based extended target tracking approaches, such as proposed in [78], while taking into account the expected distribution of the extended targets in the computation of the ILH. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%