Adsorption isotherms are reported for HZSM-5 and silica gel using
a series of gas adsorptives at
several temperatures above their critical temperature. The data
are analyzed with a new multiple equilibria
adsorption model producing equilibrium constants
(K
i
), capacities
(n
i
), and enthalpies
(−ΔH
i
) for each of
the
processes. Unlike the amorphous adsorbents studied earlier, which
contain a distribution of pore sizes, zeolitic
materials have uniform pore dimensions. This uniformity provides a
test of our interpretation of the number
of processes required in the isotherm fits of the multiple equilibrium
analysis, MEA. As expected from the
two pores in the structure of HZSM-5, most adsorbates require two
processes (K
1,ads and
K
2,ads) to fit the
adsorption isotherms. HZSM-5 is compared to amorphous carbonaceous
adsorbents, revealing fundamental
differences in their behavior. Small cylindrical channels in
HZSM-5 lead to an unfavorable entropic contribution
from restrictions imposed by adsorptive packing and interactions with
the channel walls. The pores of the
carbons studied (Drago, R. S.; Kassel, W. S.; Burns, D. S.; McGilvray,
J. M.; Lafrenz, T. J.; Showalter, S. K.
J.
Phys. Chem. B
1997, 101,
7548−7555) are slit-shaped, leading to less restriction and larger
equilibrium
constants. For several adsorbates, the greater enthalpic
interactions in the small HZSM-5 pores are accompanied
by lower equilibrium constants than in the larger pores because of
unfavorable entropic contributions. Finally,
the larger total micropore volumes of the carbons studied for these
adsorptives (Drago, R. S.; Kassel, W. S.;
Burns, D. S.; McGilvray, J. M.; Lafrenz, T. J.; Showalter, S. K.
J.
Phys. Chem. B
1997, 101,
7548−7555)
result in increased capacity compared to HZSM-5. The process
capacities from MEA (mol g-1) are
converted
to pore volumes using the molar volume. Surface areas are
calculated from molecular areas of the adsorbates.
Pore volumes and surface areas calculated from the process
capacities are compared to those from conventional
N2 porosimetry and are shown to provide a more detailed and
more accurate assessment of areas and volumes.
These results show that MEA has the potential of becoming a
standard characterization method for microporous
solids that will lead to an increased understanding of their behavior
in gas adsorption and catalysis.