2006
DOI: 10.1186/1471-213x-6-53
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple enhancers contribute to spatial but not temporal complexity in the expression of the proneural gene, amos

Abstract: Background: The regulation of proneural gene expression is an important aspect of neurogenesis. In the study of the Drosophila proneural genes, scute and atonal, several themes have emerged that contribute to our understanding of the mechanism of neurogenesis. First, spatial complexity in proneural expression results from regulation by arrays of enhancer elements. Secondly, regulation of proneural gene expression occurs in distinct temporal phases, which tend to be under the control of separate enhancers. Thir… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…while present in the proneural genes for neuroblasts and sensory hair cells, achaete and scute , it is not found in amos , the proneural gene for olfactory sensilla (Van Doren et al, 1991 and 1992; Martinez et al, 1993; zur Lage et al, 2003; Holohan et al, 2006). Similarly, among vertebrate proneural homologues, direct auto-regulation is present in Math1 but not in Mash1 or Neurogenin (Helms et al, 2000; Meredith and Johnson, 2000; Bertrand et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…while present in the proneural genes for neuroblasts and sensory hair cells, achaete and scute , it is not found in amos , the proneural gene for olfactory sensilla (Van Doren et al, 1991 and 1992; Martinez et al, 1993; zur Lage et al, 2003; Holohan et al, 2006). Similarly, among vertebrate proneural homologues, direct auto-regulation is present in Math1 but not in Mash1 or Neurogenin (Helms et al, 2000; Meredith and Johnson, 2000; Bertrand et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Could other mechanisms thus be used to replace autoregulation to maintain stable neural fate? Positive autoregulation has not been found in studies of some Drosophila neurons, indicating that although the segregation of initiation and autoregulation provides an important conceptual insight into mechanisms of fate specification, similar outcomes might also be achieved by other regulatory mechanisms (Holohan et al, 2006;Zhou et al, 2017). It is possible that transcription factors further downstream are responsible.…”
Section: Coding Mutationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combined, these changes allow a spatially and temporally discrete regulation of both atonal paralogs in vertebrates thus tying them into very different functions (ear development for Atoh1 and eye development for Atoh7 ) that are served by the single atonal gene in flies (both ‘ears’ and eyes). Similar to Atoh1 , fly atonal also has an autoregulatory enhancer [39, 40], but amos appears to lack such autoregulation [41]. The presence of such auto-regulatory enhancers in fly atonal and mouse Atoh1 suggests that this may be the ancestral condition.…”
Section: Evolution Of Bhlh Genes For Differentiation Regulation Of Nementioning
confidence: 99%