2015
DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2015.2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple endosymbiont infections and reproductive manipulations in a linyphiid spider population

Abstract: In many arthropods, maternally inherited endosymbiotic bacteria can increase infection frequency by manipulating host reproduction. Multiple infections of different bacteria in a single host population are common, yet few studies have documented concurrent endosymbiont phenotypes or explored their potential interactions. We hypothesized that spiders might be a particularly useful taxon for investigating endosymbiont interactions, because they are host to a plethora of endosymbiotic bacteria and frequently exhi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Co-infection of multiple endosymbionts in the arthropods host was common (Duron et al, 2008;Engelstädter & Hurst, 2009;Goodacre et al, 2006), and relatively few studies have explored the phenotypic effect of multiple endosymbionts on their hosts (Curry, Paliulis, Welch, Harwood, & White, 2015;White, Kelly, Cockburn, Perlman, & Hunter, 2011). Little information has been obtained in relation to the emulative distribution of multiple endosymbionts in their hosts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Co-infection of multiple endosymbionts in the arthropods host was common (Duron et al, 2008;Engelstädter & Hurst, 2009;Goodacre et al, 2006), and relatively few studies have explored the phenotypic effect of multiple endosymbionts on their hosts (Curry, Paliulis, Welch, Harwood, & White, 2015;White, Kelly, Cockburn, Perlman, & Hunter, 2011). Little information has been obtained in relation to the emulative distribution of multiple endosymbionts in their hosts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This lack of phenotypic differentiation between populations provides further evidence for the potentially hidden nature of suppressors, which is consistent with the hypothesis that endosymbionts and suppressors readily evolve in response to endosymbiont infection. At least for the Araneae order this could partly explain the discrepancy between the high number of spider species infected with endosymbionts (Goodacre et al, 2006) and the paucity of cases in which their effects have been demonstrated (Gunnarsson et al, 2009;Vanthournout et al, 2011Vanthournout et al, , 2014Curry et al, 2015) or are apparently absent (Stefanini & Duron, 2012). Moreover, endosymbiont infection is increasingly regarded as a major consideration in arthropod conservation biology (Nice et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we explore whether endosymbiotic effects may be phenotypically hidden by the action of host suppressor genes in the dwarf spider Oedothorax gibbosus. Although spiders have been shown to be a particular hotspot for certain endosymbionts (Duron et al, 2008b), only a very limited number of studies have shown reproductive effects (Gunnarsson et al, 2009;Vanthournout et al, 2011Vanthournout et al, , 2014Curry et al, 2015). The dwarf spider Oedothorax gibbosus is infected with a male-killing Wolbachia that causes a similarly femalebiased sex ratio (Vanthournout et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feminization induced by Wolbachia has been demonstrated in lepidopteran and hemipteran insects and spiders (Negri, 2012;Curry et al, 2015). In the butterfly Eurema hecabe, it has been demonstrated that the Wolbachia feminizing effect acts continuously throughout the larval development for the maintenance of the female phenotype (Narita et al, 2007).…”
Section: Reproductive Manipulations and Other Phenotypic Effects Of Wmentioning
confidence: 99%