2015
DOI: 10.1112/jtopol/jtv008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple disjunction for spaces of smooth embeddings

Abstract: Abstract. We obtain multirelative connectivity statements about spaces of smooth embeddings, deducing these from a similar result about spaces of Poincaré embeddings that was established in [GK1] and a similar result about condordance embeddings that was established in [G1].

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Essentially because the classical adjunction can be factorized as follows: Seq(S) Seq(S) P 0 Bimod P-Q . In this section, we give a presentation of the left adjoint functors (12). Thereafter, we adapt the Boardman-Vogt resolution in the context of (k-truncated) bimodules to obtain functorial cofibrant replacements.…”
Section: Remark 23mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Essentially because the classical adjunction can be factorized as follows: Seq(S) Seq(S) P 0 Bimod P-Q . In this section, we give a presentation of the left adjoint functors (12). Thereafter, we adapt the Boardman-Vogt resolution in the context of (k-truncated) bimodules to obtain functorial cofibrant replacements.…”
Section: Remark 23mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[12] Let M and N be two smooth manifolds of dimension d and n respectively. If n − d − 2 > 0, then the Taylor towers associated to the functors Emb(− ; N), Imm(− ; N) and Emb(− ; N) converge.If one considers the embedding spaces and immersion spaces with compact support, then one has to change slightly the construction of the Taylor towers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remark 3.1. The version of the Poincaré embedding space appearing here is slightly different from the one in [GK1,defn. 2.8].…”
Section: Poincaré Embeddingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our definition here amounts to taking a certain open and closed subspace of I (A) rather than a homotopy fiber. This definition is equivalent to the one in [GK1] because the component of D n ∈ I (S n−1 ) is contractible.…”
Section: Poincaré Embeddingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation