Multiple Criteria Decision Aid

Papathanasiou, Jason; Πλόσκας, Νικόλαος

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-91648-4

Cited by 85 publications

(61 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…To solve these problems, methods of comparative identification [11,19] or expert collective assessment [31][32][33][34][35] are used, which give quite satisfactory results on a set of effective low-power solutions. In this case, the model of generalized utility based on the Kolmogorov-Gabor polynomial is used as a universal one [11,19,36].…”

Section: Analysis Of the Problem And Methods Of Its Solutionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Combined Method of Ranking Options in Project Decision Support Systems

Beskorovainyi

2020

Innovative Technologies and Scientific Solutions for Industries

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Analysis Of the Problem And Methods Of Its Solutionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Combined Method of Ranking Options in Project Decision Support Systems

Beskorovainyi

2020

Innovative Technologies and Scientific Solutions for Industries

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Step 5. Normally, we should use S, R, Q ranking lists to propose the compromise solution or set of compromise solutions, as showed in [69,70]. However, in this paper would be used only Q ranking list.…”

Section: Topsismentioning

confidence: 99%

Efficiency of Methods for Determining the Relevance of Criteria in Sustainable Transport Problems: A Comparative Case Study

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Problems related to sustainable urban transport have gained in importance with the rapid growth of urban agglomerations. There is, therefore, a need to support decision-making processes in this area, a trend that is visible in the literature. Many methods have already been presented as a useful decision-making tool in this field. However, it is still a significant challenge to properly determine the relevance of the criteria because it is one of the most critical points of many presented techniques to solve decision problems. In this work, we propose two new approaches to determining the relevance of particular decision criteria effectively in sustainable transport problems. For this purpose, we examine a study case for the evaluation of electric bikes evaluated against eight criteria, which have been taken from earlier work. We calculate the relevance of each criterion using four different approaches and then evaluate their effectiveness using a reference ranking and popular multi-criteria decision analysis methods. The results are compared with each other by using similarity coefficients. Finally, we summarize the results obtained and set out further methods of development.

show abstract

“…It has been used in numerous areas and academic disciplines for decades [16]. In [17], Python codings for the application of the TOPSIS method are provided. In the literature, there exist several MCDA comparison studies such as [18].…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

An Application of a Fuzzy TOPSIS Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Algorithm for Dry Bulk Carrier Selection

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Decision-making in ship investment is a complex and difficult process with trade-offs. The purpose of this study is to guide the decisions on the purchase of dry bulk carriers based on a Fuzzy Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (Fuzzy TOPSIS) multi-criteria decision analysis algorithm. A set of criteria and a set of alternatives based on various characteristics are developed and evaluated with expert questionnaires. The proposed method provides weights for a given criteria to provide ranked alternatives, identifying the optimal solution. The alternatives among the multiple suppliers are ranked in the context of the shipping investment. This study reveals that shipowners are rather acting with a holistic perspective in ship purchase; however, we prove a detailed analysis is required.

show abstract

Multiple Criteria Decision Aid

Cited by 85 publications

References 0 publications

Combined Method of Ranking Options in Project Decision Support Systems

Combined Method of Ranking Options in Project Decision Support Systems

Efficiency of Methods for Determining the Relevance of Criteria in Sustainable Transport Problems: A Comparative Case Study

An Application of a Fuzzy TOPSIS Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Algorithm for Dry Bulk Carrier Selection

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About