1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0006-3223(98)00043-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple correlations and bonferroni’s correction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
354
0
5

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 534 publications
(361 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
2
354
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The final sample consisted of 158 valid EQI protocols (95.8%). The SCIBI-variables in this second study were ordinal and not normally distributed, so for n = 158 non-parametric Spearman's correlation analyses were performed and these correlations were Bonferroni corrected because multiple correlations were calculated (Curtin & Schulz, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The final sample consisted of 158 valid EQI protocols (95.8%). The SCIBI-variables in this second study were ordinal and not normally distributed, so for n = 158 non-parametric Spearman's correlation analyses were performed and these correlations were Bonferroni corrected because multiple correlations were calculated (Curtin & Schulz, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the next step, each unit was then used to compute correlations with reaction times, detection rates, and the discrimination index AЈ. Only significant correlations were selected that met an ␣-level of 0.05 with Bonferroni correction (Curtin and Schulz, 1998). Finally, the low spatial resolution of the correlation map was interpolated with a spline function in SPM8 to be compatible with the standard brain template for display purposes.…”
Section: Correlations Between Behavioral Responses and Source Gamma-bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Total and uMARS sub-domains were associated with subjective quality, as the associations among uMARS sub-domains are not considered meaningful [50] Given the multiple tests, p values were corrected for type I error [72]. Mann-Whitney (M-W) and Kruskal Wallis (K-W) tests examined differences in continuous variables.…”
Section: Data Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After applying the appropriate p value corrections for multiple correlation tests [72], good health status was associated with 'engagement', total uMARS and 'subjective quality'; being obese with total uMARS score; and use of Lark with 'functionality' and 'information'. Very good/excellent health status was negatively related to 'engagement'; use of SparkPeople was negatively related to 'information'.…”
Section: Associations With Users' Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%