2014
DOI: 10.1124/jpet.114.220491
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple Compound-Related Adverse Properties Contribute to Liver Injury Caused by Endothelin Receptor Antagonists

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
41
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Addition of extracellular bile acids in the cell-culture media caused increased cytotoxicity of liver spheroid cultures relative to normal media treated spheroid cultures treated with bosentan over 14 day (Hendriks et al 2016). In our studies, ambrisentan was not cytotoxic to hLiMT and has a reported 10- and 30-fold lower potency to inhibit BSEP transporter function than bosentan and sitax(s)entan, respectively (Kenna et al 2015). Taken together, the findings in this report in addition to the recent published report by Hendriks et al (2016) support that hLiMT may be a valuable in vitro tool to evaluate the functional and phenotypic (e.g., cytotoxicity) effects of bile-acid transport inhibition in an intact hepatocellular model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Addition of extracellular bile acids in the cell-culture media caused increased cytotoxicity of liver spheroid cultures relative to normal media treated spheroid cultures treated with bosentan over 14 day (Hendriks et al 2016). In our studies, ambrisentan was not cytotoxic to hLiMT and has a reported 10- and 30-fold lower potency to inhibit BSEP transporter function than bosentan and sitax(s)entan, respectively (Kenna et al 2015). Taken together, the findings in this report in addition to the recent published report by Hendriks et al (2016) support that hLiMT may be a valuable in vitro tool to evaluate the functional and phenotypic (e.g., cytotoxicity) effects of bile-acid transport inhibition in an intact hepatocellular model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Both drugs have strong association with DILI, where bosentan has been given a cautionary “black box” warning for DILI by the FDA and sitax(s)entan was voluntarily removed from the market due to hepatotoxicity concerns. Extensive studies, in particular on bosentan, support potential mechanisms of BSEP transport inhibition, and mitochondrial toxicity that lead to intrahepatic cholestasis and hepatocellular injury (Fattinger et al 2001; Kenna et al 2015). It remains unclear if the treatment time, enhanced liver phenotype, or presence of bile-canicular membranes were responsible for the increased sensitivity of hLiMT to these compounds relative to PHH in our studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[58][59][60] This knowledge has triggered the ''creation'' of a risk matrix, where effects on multiple mechanisms result in higher scores, which correlate with higher risk of causing human DILI. For more detail, please refer to Kenna et al 61 and Shah et al 62 Author Disclosure Statement Mohammed Taimi, Christopher Strock, Jonathan Gilbert, and Shuzhen Qin are employees of Cyprotex. The work presented here is a joint scientific collaboration.…”
Section: Less-dili Drugsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…123125 Inhibition of bile acid transporters has been proposed as an underlying mechanism of sitaxsentan- and bosentan-mediated DILI. 103,126,127 On the other hand, recently approved ERAs, ambrisentan and macitentan, are associated with a lower risk of liver injury. 128130 Studies using human SCH demonstrated that individual ERAs have differential effects on the hepatobiliary disposition of bile acids.…”
Section: Use Of Sandwich–cultured Hepatocytes To Study Drug–induced Lmentioning
confidence: 99%