2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0925-2312(01)00653-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple comparison procedures applied to model selection

Abstract: This paper presents a new approach to model selection based on hypothesis testing. We ÿrst describe a procedure to generate di erent scores for any candidate model from a single sample of training data and then discuss how to apply multiple comparison procedures (MCP) to model selection. MCP statistical tests allow us to compare three or more groups of data while controlling the probability of making at least one Type I error. The complete procedure is illustrated on several model selection tasks, including th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
39
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A nonparametric Friedman's test was performed on the accuracies for total larvae across folds due to unequal variances and confirmed results were not significant between age groups (c 2,5 = 4.77, P = 0.092). It should be noted that this statistical test does not exactly conform to those presented for model selection in the literature (Vazquez et al 2001;Pizarro et al 2002). Those examples performed analyses on test data from the same source, and our test data were composed of different images across folds for each training set.…”
Section: Thompson Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A nonparametric Friedman's test was performed on the accuracies for total larvae across folds due to unequal variances and confirmed results were not significant between age groups (c 2,5 = 4.77, P = 0.092). It should be noted that this statistical test does not exactly conform to those presented for model selection in the literature (Vazquez et al 2001;Pizarro et al 2002). Those examples performed analyses on test data from the same source, and our test data were composed of different images across folds for each training set.…”
Section: Thompson Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some procedures for solving question 8 such as the 5 × 2 cv test are given by Dietterich (1998), further investigated by Alpaydin (1999) and applied in a benchmark study on ensemble methods (Dietterich 2000). Pizarro, Guerrero, and Galindo (2002) suggest to use some classical multiple test procedures for solving this problem. Mixed models are applied for the comparison of algorithms across benchmark problems (for example Lim, Loh, and Shih 2000;Kim and Loh 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En cuanto a la elección del diccionario dentro del MOF, se observa que las diferencias de los resultados no son estadísticamente significativas cuando se realiza una prueba de selección del modelo de Kruskal-Wallis (Pizarro, Guerrero, & Galindo, 2002). Esto es positivo porque la metodología no queda sujeta a la elección del diccionario.…”
Section: Discusión General De Los Resultadosunclassified