2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2010.09.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple classifier architectures and their application to credit risk assessment

Abstract: Abstract.Multiple classifier systems combine several individual classifiers to deliver a final classification decision. An increasingly controversial question is whether such systems can outperform the single best classifier and if so, what form of multiple classifier system yields the greatest benefit.In this paper the performance of several multiple classifier systems are evaluated in terms of their ability to correctly classify consumers as good or bad credit risks. Empirical results suggest that many, but … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
88
0
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 185 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
4
88
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…To illustrate the standardization process, consider "Age" in Row 71 of Table 3. The age of the legal person associated with loan X2012060800099 in Column 1231 is 38, which is within the optimum interval [31]. According to Equation (3c), this makes the standardized value x ij of "Age" in this case equal to 1.…”
Section: Establishing the Credit Rating Index Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To illustrate the standardization process, consider "Age" in Row 71 of Table 3. The age of the legal person associated with loan X2012060800099 in Column 1231 is 38, which is within the optimum interval [31]. According to Equation (3c), this makes the standardized value x ij of "Age" in this case equal to 1.…”
Section: Establishing the Credit Rating Index Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Florez-Lopez proposed a variety of statistical methods (multiple discriminant analysis, multinomial logit regression, and ordered logit) and methods associated with decision trees to explore the determinants of ratings [30]. Finlay presented a multi-classifier system and introduced a new boosting algorithm, dubbed ET Boost [31]. Finally, Paleologo et al created a method for adding missing data and proposed the use of an ensemble classification technique called subagging [32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As noted, automated lending risk evaluations are currently imperfect and, in fact, the failure of credit scoring algorithms to identify loan recipients who will eventually default on their loans results in sizable losses on an ongoing basis [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The linear combination models proposed by Shen, Li and Song (2008, 2011) and Wong et al (2007 are used to examine the optimal subset selection algorithm for this study. The information concepts have never been applied to the selection of individual models as combination models, and all available individual models are used as inputs for the linear combination methods in tourism demand forecasting literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Abellán and Masegosa (2010) proposed the ensemble method using credal decision trees, and showed the good percentage of correct classifications and an improvement in time of processing, especially for large data sets. Finlay (2011) applied bagging and boosting methods to the credit risk assessment to classify consumers as good or bad credit risks, and proposed a new boosting algorithm, 'error trimmed boosting'. Experiments showed that the bagging and boosting methods outperform other multi-classifier systems, and 'error trimmed boosting' outperforms bagging and AdaBoost by a significant margin.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%