2019
DOI: 10.1214/19-ejs1568
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple changepoint detection with partial information on changepoint times

Abstract: This paper proposes a new minimum description length procedure to detect multiple changepoints in time series data when some times are a priori thought more likely to be changepoints. This scenario arises with temperature time series homogenization pursuits, our focus here. Our Bayesian procedure constructs a natural prior distribution for the situation, and is shown to estimate the changepoint locations consistently, with an optimal convergence rate. Our methods substantially improve changepoint detection pow… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A better penalty for this problem, and one that accounts for the location times of the changepoints, is the minimum description length (MDL) penalty of form P(m;τ1,,τm;X)=ln(m+1)+12r=2m+1ln(τrτr1)+r=2mln(τr)+ln(N+1) if m ≥ 1 and zero if m =0. This penalty will be used here because of its superior performance in changepoint simulation studies (Li et al, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A better penalty for this problem, and one that accounts for the location times of the changepoints, is the minimum description length (MDL) penalty of form P(m;τ1,,τm;X)=ln(m+1)+12r=2m+1ln(τrτr1)+r=2mln(τr)+ln(N+1) if m ≥ 1 and zero if m =0. This penalty will be used here because of its superior performance in changepoint simulation studies (Li et al, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our GA optimizes a minimum descriptive length (MDL) penalized likelihood. An MDL penalty, viewed akin to AICC and BIC penalties, is a penalty specifically tailored to the changepoint problem stemming from information criterion (Li, Lund, & Hewaarachchi, ). The MDL penalty is not proportional to the number of changepoints, but rather depends on the position of the individual changepoints: Changepoints occurring close together are penalized more heavily than sparsely occurring changepoints.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other available approaches use the principle of dynamic programming (see Antoch & Jarušková, ; Zeileis, Kleiber, Krämer, & Hornik, , and the references therein) and genetic algorithms (e.g., S. Li & Lund, ) to find a solution optimizing some likelihood function, which is usually the residual sum of squares, AIC, or BIC. Y. Li and Lund () and Y. Li, Lund, and Hewaarachchi () use Bayesian techniques to account for partial information about change points documented in metadata. A separate group of testing approaches that often do not require to set the upper limit m for the number of change points are developed for monitoring tasks (e.g., see Aue et al, ; Eichinger & Kirch, ; Horváth et al, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our goal is to select the most likely model given the observed data, i.e., to perform model selection. e objective function for the model selection will be derived based on the Bayesian Minimum Description Length (BMDL) framework [2]. For each candidate model, we compute its BMDL score; and among all models we visit, the one with the smallest BMDL score is the most optimal.…”
Section: Multiple Changepoint Con Gurationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we introduce a novel model-based changepoint detection approach, which is exible, explainable, easy to automate, and most importantly, e ective in reducing false positives. We follow the Bayesian Minimum Description Length (BMDL) framework in Li et al [2], and extend the method there to handle more exible data monitoring tasks. Our method automatically detects not only the optimal combinations of changepoint locations in the past, but also whether the time series data has seasonality and/or autocorrelation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%