Multiple-center study of carotid endarterectomy in different age groups with analysis of adverse predictors

Виноградов, Р. А.; Ерофеев, А А; Chernykh, K. P.; Заркуа, Н. Э.; Baghdavadze, G.Sh.; Lider, R.Yu.; Черных, Александр Петрович; Baryshev, A.G.; Матусевич, В. В.; Шабаев, А. Р.; Луценко, В. А.; Оликов, О. М.; Sultanov, R. V.; Чикин, А. Е.; Kalinin, E.Yu.; Artyukhov, S. V.; Linets, G. I.; Pоrkhanov, V. A.; Хубулава, Г. Г.

doi:10.17116/kardio202114041280

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…[1][2][3][4][5] The typical contingent of patients undergoing this intervention most often suffers from coronary heart disease, diabetes mellitus, multifocal atherosclerosis (MFA), chronic renal insufficiency and other comorbid conditions. [6][7][8][9][10] At the same time, the importance of hemodynamically significant stenosis correction may exceed the necessity for full compensation of concomitant pathology (poorly controlled diabetes, uncompensated arterial hypertension), if it comes to, for example, subocclusion or unstable atherosclerotic plaque in the internal carotid artery (ICA). 2,5,[8][9][10] A separate question raises the justification of CEE in patients with resistant arterial hypertension (RAH), the number of which, according to a number of studies, reaches 40% of the total patient sample.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effects of different types of carotid endarterectomy on the course of resistant arterial hypertension

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective Analysis of the dynamics of systolic blood pressure (SBP) and the results of various types of carotid endarterectomy (СЕЕ) (classical with plasty of the reconstruction zone with a patch, eversion, formation of a new bifurcation, autoarterial reconstruction, glomus-saving techniques) in patients with resistant arterial hypertension (RAH). Materials and methods The actual cohort, comparative, retrospective, open research for the period from January 2013 to December 2021 includes 1577 patients with significant hemodynamic stenosis of the internal carotid artery Depending on revascularization strategy five groups were formed: Group 1: 18.3% ( n = 289) – classical Carotid endarterectomy with plasty of the reconstruction zone with a patch (from diepoxy-treated xenopericardium or synthetic); Group 2: 29.9% ( n = 472) – eversional CEE with cut-off of carotid gloomus (CG); Group 3: 6.9% ( n = 109) – the formation of a new bifurcation; Group 4: 7.4% ( n = 117) - autoarterial reconstruction; Group 5: 37.4% ( n = 590) – glomus-saving CEE (1 technique – according to A. N. Kazantsev; two technicians – according to R.A. Vinogradov; three technicians – according to K.A.Antsupov). According to the 24-h blood pressure monitor in the preoperative period, the following degrees of AH were identified: 1° – 5.7% ( n = 89); 2° – 64.2% ( n = 1013); and 3° – 30.1% ( n = 475). Results In the postoperative period, no significant differences were obtained in the frequency of deaths, myocardial infarction, stroke, hemorrhagic transformation. However, according to the frequency of the combined endpoint (death + myocardial infarction + ischemic stroke + hemorrhagic transformation), the lowest rates were observed in the group of classical carotid endarterectomy with plasty of the reconstruction zone with a patch and glomus-sparing CEE (group 1: 1.03% ( n = 3); group 2: 3.6% ( n = 17); group 3: 3.67% ( n = 4); group 4: 2.56% ( n = 3); group 5: 0.5% ( n = 3); p = 0.10). This is due to the absence of cases of labile AH and hypertensive crises among patients of groups 1 and 5, which was ensured by the preservation of carotid glomus (CG). As a result, the number of patients with 2 and 3 degrees of hypertension in these groups decreased statistically significantly. The vast majority of patients after these operations achieved a stable target SBP. In groups 2, 3, and 4, there was a statistically significant increase in the number of patients with 2 and 3 degrees of AH, which is associated with excision of the CG Conclusion Classical CEE and glomus-sparing CEE techniques make it possible to achieve a stable target SBP level in patients with RAH as a result of CG preservation. Removal or traumatization of the latter during eversional CEE, the formation of a new bifurcation, autoarterial reconstruction is accompanied by the development of labile hypertension, an increase in the degree of hypertension and a high risk of hemorrhagic transformation in the brain. Thus, the most effective and safe types of CEE in the presence of RAH are classical CEE with plasty of the reconstruction zone with a patch and glomus-sparing CEE, accompanied by the lowest incidence of adverse cardiovascular events caused by postoperative hypertensive crisis and hyperperfusion syndrome.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effects of different types of carotid endarterectomy on the course of resistant arterial hypertension

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Carotid endarterectomy in Russia. What if current guidelines do not answer difficult questions?

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This literature review covers the publications of Russian vascular surgeons in recent years and deals with debatable issues of carotid surgery, including: 1. What is the best technique for carotid endarterectomy (CEA)? 2. Why does restenosis of the internal carotid artery (ICA) develop and how to eliminate it? 3. How to operate on bilateral ICA stenosis? 4. Should carotid glomus be preserved? 5. Is CEA safe in the acute phase of cerebrovascular accident (CVA)? 6. Is CEA safe in elderly patients? 7. How to operate on patients with combined internal carotid and coronary artery involvement? The evidence presented in this publication makes it possible to draw the following conclusions: 1. When choosing a CEA technique, the classical technique with patch angioplasty should be avoided due to the high risk of ICA restenosis. 2. To eliminate ICA restenosis, carotid angioplasty with stenting (CAS) should be used. When performing primary CEA with ICA transposition over the hypoglossal nerve, reCEA can be used 3. In the absence of contraindications, bilateral ICA stenosis can be operated at the same time using CEA. 4. CEA with carotid glomus preservation is the operation of choice in the treatment of patients with hemodynamically significant ICA stenosis due to the elimination of the risks of postoperative hypertension and the formation of hemorrhagic transformation. 5. If there are indications for cerebral revascularization in the most acute period of stroke, CEA should be abandoned in favor of CAS. 6. In old age, CAS is the safest treatment strategy. 7. In the presence of a combined ICA and coronary involvement, the choice of treatment tactics should be carried out only by a multidisciplinary commission, taking into account the risk stratification of adverse cardiovascular events.

show abstract

"<i>Festina lente</i>" — a multicenter study on the outcomes of carotid endarterectomy, depending on vessel suturing speed

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim. Analysis of inhospital and long-term outcomes of conventional carotid endarterectomy (CEA) depending on vessel suturing speed.Material and methods. The present prospective multicenter study for the period from March 1, 2017 to October 1, 2020 included 2366 patients who underwent conventional CEA with patch angioplasty. Depending on the time required to apply 1 stitch, 4 groups of patients were formed: group 1 (n=471; 19,9%) — 1 stitch per 2 seconds; group 2 (n=865; 36,5%) — 1 stitch per 3 seconds; group 3 (n=692; 29,2%) — 1 stitch per 4 seconds; group 4 (n=338; 14,3%) — 1 stitch per 5 seconds. The term "stitch" refers to two needle punctures. The follow-up postoperative period was 18,5±11,0 months.Results. There were no deaths and myocardial infarctions (MI) in the inhospital postoperative period. In group 1, anastomotic bleeding (n=93; 19,7%; p<0,0001) and stroke (n=3; 0,63%; p=0,02) due to internal carotid artery (ICA) thrombosis were more common. In the long-term follow-up period, there were no significant differences in mortality and MI rates. However, ICA restenosis requiring repeated CEA (n=37; 7,85%; p<0,0001) and related stroke/transient ischemic attack (n=13; 2,8%; p=0,0001) were more often diagnosed in 1 group of patients. According to Kaplan-Meier curves, restenosis was most often revealed 6 months after CEA in the general sample.Conclusion. 1. Vessel suturing at a speed of 1 stitch per 2 seconds is associated with an increased risk of intraoperative ICA thrombosis, bleeding along the anastomosis, stroke, as well as restenosis and stroke in the long-term follow-up period. 2. Vessel suturing at a speed of 1 stitch per 5 seconds is not accompanied by an increase in inhospital stroke rate, despite the maximum ICA occlusion time relative to other groups of patients. 3. Vessel suturing at a speed of 1 stitch per 3 or 4 seconds characterized by the lowest incidence of all complications at the inhospital and long-term stages of postoperative follow-up.

show abstract

Multiple-center study of carotid endarterectomy in different age groups with analysis of adverse predictors

Cited by 4 publications

References 16 publications

Effects of different types of carotid endarterectomy on the course of resistant arterial hypertension

Effects of different types of carotid endarterectomy on the course of resistant arterial hypertension

Carotid endarterectomy in Russia. What if current guidelines do not answer difficult questions?

"<i>Festina lente</i>" — a multicenter study on the outcomes of carotid endarterectomy, depending on vessel suturing speed

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About