2017
DOI: 10.1093/oep/gpx038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple borrowing and adverse selection in credit markets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More recently, the issue of multiple borrowing has become rampant in the microfinance industry, thus calling for the dire attention of practitioners and researchers (Lascelles and Mendelson, 2012; Mia, 2017). Generally, multiple borrowing signifies simultaneous acquisition of loans from more than one financial institution (Van Tassel, 2017). While we remain neutral on the effect of multiple borrowing on microfinance beneficiaries [1], the existing literature seems to be skewed toward its negative effect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, the issue of multiple borrowing has become rampant in the microfinance industry, thus calling for the dire attention of practitioners and researchers (Lascelles and Mendelson, 2012; Mia, 2017). Generally, multiple borrowing signifies simultaneous acquisition of loans from more than one financial institution (Van Tassel, 2017). While we remain neutral on the effect of multiple borrowing on microfinance beneficiaries [1], the existing literature seems to be skewed toward its negative effect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%