2021
DOI: 10.1109/tsc.2018.2859986
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple Attributes QoS Prediction via Deep Neural Model with Contexts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since auto-encoder generally uses one hidden-layer neural network to learn the embedding feature, Zhang et al adopt the MLP to model the nonlinear characteristics of embedding features [32], they also embeds similar neighborhood in MLP to further improve prediction accuracy [33]. Wu et al proposed a deep neural network for making QoS prediction with contextual information [34], where a deep neural network is added to the end of FM in series for prediction. Note that the network structure is similar to the work in [35], and our work is a left-right network structure to model the model the high-order and non-linear feature interaction.…”
Section: Deep Learning Based Qos Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since auto-encoder generally uses one hidden-layer neural network to learn the embedding feature, Zhang et al adopt the MLP to model the nonlinear characteristics of embedding features [32], they also embeds similar neighborhood in MLP to further improve prediction accuracy [33]. Wu et al proposed a deep neural network for making QoS prediction with contextual information [34], where a deep neural network is added to the end of FM in series for prediction. Note that the network structure is similar to the work in [35], and our work is a left-right network structure to model the model the high-order and non-linear feature interaction.…”
Section: Deep Learning Based Qos Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(11) AFM is a model that an attention part is added to FM [44]. (12) NFM is an optimized version of FM, in which a deep neural network is added to the end of FM in series for prediction [34,35]. (13) MLP is a deep model, in with embedding features are fed into the model to learn the nonlinear interaction between user and Web API and generate prediction [32].…”
Section: B Performance Comparison (Rq1)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such settings, collaborative approaches like Matrix Factorization (MF) are used to predict missing values in the Quality of Service (QoS) vectors of various services. Some of the main contributions include [8,21,23,26,27,30]. All these works predict missing values for Response Time (RT) and THP, under various matrix densities and dimensionalities of learning algorithms.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A context-sensitive MF technique is proposed in Ref. [26], whereas [30] uses a deep neural model. All these works are evaluated using standard regression metrics and most of these use an established dataset released by Zheng [22] containing the RT and THP of 339 users and 5825 services.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This history is employed as the basis for service quality predictions. In recent years, there have been a large number of such prediction methods [3,7,8,9] but, when applying this method to predict service quality, an important premise is to ensure that the evaluation information for each QoS value submitted by users is true and reliable. Indeed, in actual environments, due to the influence of various factors, this cannot be effectively guaranteed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%