65th EAGE Conference &Amp; Exhibition 2003
DOI: 10.3997/2214-4609.201405721
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple attenuation using an apex-shifted Radon transform

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This may be explained by the observation that due to the aliased and non-hyperbolic nature of the multiple arrivals, the residuals and artefacts left by Radon processes tend to be high amplitude samples at near offsets. The application of both a non-standard parameterisation of parabolic Radon demultiple and a shiftedapex Radon demultiple algorithm (Hargreaves et al, 2003) on this dataset showed improvements over the standard highresolution Radon demultiple result, however, while improving the multiple attenuation both processes also increased the level of primary attenuation. It was therefore decided to only apply 2-D SRME and NS3D.…”
Section: Synthetic Examplementioning
confidence: 85%
“…This may be explained by the observation that due to the aliased and non-hyperbolic nature of the multiple arrivals, the residuals and artefacts left by Radon processes tend to be high amplitude samples at near offsets. The application of both a non-standard parameterisation of parabolic Radon demultiple and a shiftedapex Radon demultiple algorithm (Hargreaves et al, 2003) on this dataset showed improvements over the standard highresolution Radon demultiple result, however, while improving the multiple attenuation both processes also increased the level of primary attenuation. It was therefore decided to only apply 2-D SRME and NS3D.…”
Section: Synthetic Examplementioning
confidence: 85%
“…If more phases are needed to be picked, we can just add neural units in the classification layer and label recordings with the same strategies. Meanwhile, we post-processed GF features by applying post-processing technique to measure the GF flatness through a recursive scheme according to (7) and (8). Then GF is used for training the neural network to pick different phases automatically.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another popular class of demultiple techniques is based on variants of the Radon transform (Foster and Mosher, 1992). Several revised Radon transforms have been proposed for multiple attenuation (Hunt et al, 1996;Zhou and Greenhalgh, 1996;Hargreave et al, 2003;Wang, 2003a). Radontransform-based methods often fail to provide accurate separation because of their nonsparsity in characterizing seismic data, although they can be improved by high-resolution methods (Sacchi and Ulrych, 1995;Herrmann et al, 2000;Trad et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%