Multiple aspect ranking for researcher expertise finding

Sriharee, Gridaphat; Anekboon, Khantharat

doi:10.1109/ickea.2016.7803020

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…There are different types of documents that have been used in the current expert finding systems studies. The most used textual expertise source is publications, which have been used by authors in [36,38,44,48,49,53,58,59,61,62,[66][67][68][70][71][72][73]80] as their main expertise source, while publications have been combined with other expertise sources in [22,40,41,43,44,47,55,60,69,75,88,89]. In addition to publications, reference [42] used movies as expertise evidence.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Expert Finding Systems: A Systematic Review

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The data overload problem and the specific nature of the experts’ knowledge can hinder many users from finding experts with the expertise they required. There are several expert finding systems, which aim to solve the data overload problem and often recommend experts who can fulfil the users’ information needs. This study conducted a Systematic Literature Review on the state-of-the-art expert finding systems and expertise seeking studies published between 2010 and 2019. We used a systematic process to select ninety-six articles, consisting of 57 journals, 34 conference proceedings, three book chapters, and one thesis. This study analyses the domains of expert finding systems, expertise sources, methods, and datasets. It also discusses the differences between expertise retrieval and seeking. Moreover, it identifies the contextual factors that have been combined into expert finding systems. Finally, it identifies five gaps in expert finding systems for future research. This review indicated that ≈65% of expert finding systems are used in the academic domain. This review forms a basis for future expert finding systems research.

show abstract