2009
DOI: 10.1002/9780470508602.ch2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple Amorphous–Amorphous Transitions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
31
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 284 publications
3
31
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…2). Our results for SiO 2 glass along with those of previous studies (17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24) indicate that the velocity-pressure trends in SiO 2 glass can be interpreted as a gradual transition from four-to sixfold coordination of Si below 40 GPa, predominantly sixfold coordination from 40 to 140 GPa, and a transition from sixfold to a higher coordination state above 140 GPa (16) (Fig. 2).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…2). Our results for SiO 2 glass along with those of previous studies (17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24) indicate that the velocity-pressure trends in SiO 2 glass can be interpreted as a gradual transition from four-to sixfold coordination of Si below 40 GPa, predominantly sixfold coordination from 40 to 140 GPa, and a transition from sixfold to a higher coordination state above 140 GPa (16) (Fig. 2).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Therefore, the inflection points under ultrahigh pressure may primarily reflect a change of the average Si-O coordination number from 6 to 6 + . Density increases caused by structural transitions accompanied by Si-O coordination number growth occur continuously in glasses and melts and occur discontinuously in crystalline materials (e.g., Loerting et al 2009). Although it is not obvious whether the analogy between silicate glasses and silicate melts works well as a model of their structural or density changes with pressure, experimental results on the evolution of average Si-O coordination number of SiO 2 glass (Meade et al 1992;Lin et al 2007; Funamori 2008, 2010;Benmore et al 2010;Zeidler et al 2014) shows good agreement with that of SiO 2 melt calculated by MD simulations (Karki et al 2007).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these studies, and in the IR studies of pure CO2 ice (see Kataeva et al (2015) and references cited therein) the ice is much thicker than that of actual ice mantles. It is known that crystallization is characterized by long range order in the solid; in thin films, it depends on the thickness, with the thinner films often being amorphous or partially amorphous with nanocrystals (Loerting et al 2009). It is more realistic to study the segregation and crystallization in the thickness range comparable with the thickness of ice mantles (less than a few tens of a monolayer (ML)) in the ISM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%