2016
DOI: 10.1002/pmj.21563
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiphase Assessment of Project Risk Interdependencies: Evidence from a University ISD Project in Taiwan

Abstract: Project risks evolve dynamically, so variations in risk influences during the life cycle of an information system development project require analyses to devise risk management strategies cost effectively and at the appropriate stages. This study extends the Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory technique, using network theory, to assess the risk interdependencies for distinct project phases. A multiphase observation of a university information system development project in Taiwan provides a more in‐… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Once an IRM is acquired, eight of the classical DEMATEL studies classified the factors in a complicated system into four quadrants according to their locations in the diagram. In [20][21][22], the IRM is divided into four quadrants I to IV, as displayed in Figure 2, by calculating the mean of ( + ). The factors in quadrant I are identified as core factors or intertwined givers since they have high prominence and relation; the factors in quadrant II are identified as driving factors or autonomous givers because they have low prominence but high relation.…”
Section: Observations and Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once an IRM is acquired, eight of the classical DEMATEL studies classified the factors in a complicated system into four quadrants according to their locations in the diagram. In [20][21][22], the IRM is divided into four quadrants I to IV, as displayed in Figure 2, by calculating the mean of ( + ). The factors in quadrant I are identified as core factors or intertwined givers since they have high prominence and relation; the factors in quadrant II are identified as driving factors or autonomous givers because they have low prominence but high relation.…”
Section: Observations and Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Effectiveness involves the ability of the risk assessment process to cover all significant risk sources and events (Powell & Klein, 1996), risk interrelationships (Hwang, Hsiao, Chen, & Chern, 2016), and risk timing and dynamics (Hwang et al, 2016;Ward, 1999). It also concerns the ability of the process to provide sound risk exposure estimates to prioritize the identified risk sources in the order of the response attention they need (Ward, 1999).…”
Section: A Key Tension About the Nature Of Risk Assessment: The Relatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time proximity between a risk source and the associated risk event(s) Hwang et al (2016); Ward (1999)…”
Section: Risk Event Imminencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations