1994
DOI: 10.1080/00207549408957000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiperiod tool and production assignment in flexible manufacturing systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From a system designer's point of view, it is very desirable to obtain a set of non-dominated solutions providing the flexibility of reconfigurable manufacturing via simultaneously considering all the objectives. Recently, some approaches [3][4][5][6][7][8][9] have been proposed to deal with MOOPs in production planning. They can be classified into two categories:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From a system designer's point of view, it is very desirable to obtain a set of non-dominated solutions providing the flexibility of reconfigurable manufacturing via simultaneously considering all the objectives. Recently, some approaches [3][4][5][6][7][8][9] have been proposed to deal with MOOPs in production planning. They can be classified into two categories:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lee et al [6] proposed a two-stage approach to solving an operation sequence and tool selection problem. (2) Preference-based approach [7][8][9]. Given relative preferences to each individual objective, the preferencebased approach generally combines multiple objectives into a single objective function using a weighted linear combination of all objectives, and then a single-objective optimization algorithm is used to find a single solution at a time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…have not been included in the proposed algorithm, which makes it non-realistic for practical purposes. Some other analytical approaches have also been formulated by researchers (Nasir and Elsayad 1990;Ghosh and Gaimon 1992;Sodhi et al 1994;Dolinska and Besant 1995;Jinyan et al 1995;Rajamani and Adil 1996;Das and Nagendra 1997;Guerrero et al 1999;Chan 1999;Saygin and Kilic 1999).…”
Section: Scheduling Techniques In Fmsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The tool management problem has been studied by Bard [4], Tang and Denardo [12], Crama et al [5] and Sodhi et aL [10], to minimize the number of tool switches due to a change in part mix. These studies assume constant processing times and tool lives, even though the tool wear can have a significant impact on the tool replacement frequency as stated by Gray et al [6] and Sarin and Chen [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%