2021
DOI: 10.1093/biomethods/bpab021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MultiPep: a hierarchical deep learning approach for multi-label classification of peptide bioactivities

Abstract: Peptide-based therapeutics are here to stay and will prosper in the future. A key step in identifying novel peptide-drugs is the determination of their bioactivities. Recent advances in peptidomics screening approaches hold promise as a strategy for identifying novel drug targets. However, these screenings typically generate an immense number of peptides and tools for ranking these peptides prior to planning functional studies are warranted. Whereas a couple of tools in the literature predict multiple classes,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A further AMP prediction tool, MultiPep ( https://github.com/scheelelab/MultiPep ), was applied to the identification of T. circumcincta EV and EV-depleted ESP sequences with putative antimicrobial properties. MultiPep assigns each query sequence to one of 20 peptide bioactivity classes, based on intrinsic amino acid patterns [ 33 ]. Then, within each bioactivity class, individual sequences are assigned a probability score of between 0 and 1, where 1 indicates the highest probability of a given query sequence correctly identified as belonging to the corresponding bioactivity class.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A further AMP prediction tool, MultiPep ( https://github.com/scheelelab/MultiPep ), was applied to the identification of T. circumcincta EV and EV-depleted ESP sequences with putative antimicrobial properties. MultiPep assigns each query sequence to one of 20 peptide bioactivity classes, based on intrinsic amino acid patterns [ 33 ]. Then, within each bioactivity class, individual sequences are assigned a probability score of between 0 and 1, where 1 indicates the highest probability of a given query sequence correctly identified as belonging to the corresponding bioactivity class.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these processes are slow, cumbersome, and costly since they require a lot of laboratory work. A few models based on machine learning or deep learning have been used to predict the activities of peptides [ 37 , 38 , 39 ]. Herein, an online tool named Peptide Ranker (PepRank) was used to predict bioactive peptides resulting from LC-MS/MS [ 37 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Table 4 , ETFC is significantly better than MPMABP, MLBP, SP-RNN, and PrMFTP on the metrics of Precision, Coverage, Accuracy, and Absolute true. Since there are eight shared classes of peptides between ETFC (21 classes of peptides) and MultiPep (20 classes of peptides) ( Grønning et al 2021 ). For a fair comparison, we compare ETFC and MultiPep ( https://agbg.shinyapps.io/MultiPep/ ) on another test set.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rest 20% is the test set, which is applied for the model evaluation. Note that the evaluation of MultiPep ( Grønning et al 2021 ) is performed on another test set, which consists of the eight shared classes (ABP, ACP, ADP, AFP, AHP, ATP, AVP, and DPPIP) of peptides between ETFC and MultiPep.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%