2020
DOI: 10.3389/feduc.2020.542376
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiparty Conversations With People With Congenital Deafblindness: Operationalization, Significance, and Requirements

Abstract: Typically developing children are exposed to multiparty communication on a daily basis from birth. This facilitates both group belonging and observational learning. However, involvement in multiparty conversations is not self-evident for people with congenital deafblindness due to their dual sensory impairment. This study explored the added value of multiparty conversations for people with congenital deafblindness by analyzing communication partners' narrations of their experiences. Three focus group sessions … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study drew upon the experiential knowledge of communication partners as the main source of information. We gathered that knowledge through focus group sessions [ 19 ] and the participation of communication partners in the working group.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This study drew upon the experiential knowledge of communication partners as the main source of information. We gathered that knowledge through focus group sessions [ 19 ] and the participation of communication partners in the working group.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sessions also provided valuable information about the behavior and environmental factors associated with the amount of MPC that people with CDB engage in. The results of this focus group study have been published in another paper [ 19 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, it is considered more ethical to offer every child, with or without CDB, the same linguistic opportunities. (Worm et al, 2020;Damen et al, 2020;Larsen & Dammeyer, 2020;Van den Bogaerde, 2000;Dammeyer & Larsen, 2016;Bruce & Vargas, 2007;Dammeyer, 2014;Humphries et al, 2012;Souriau et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%