2019
DOI: 10.1007/jhep02(2019)059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multipartite dark matter with scalars, fermions and signatures at LHC

Abstract: Basic idea of this analysis is to achieve a two-component dark matter (DM) framework composed of a scalar and a fermion, with non-negligible DM-DM interaction contributing to thermal freeze out (hence relic density), but hiding them from direct detection bounds. We therefore augment the Standard Model (SM) with a scalar singlet (S) and three vectorlike fermions: two singlets (χ 1 , χ 2 ) and a doublet (N ). Stability of the two DM components is achieved by a discrete Z 2 × Z 2 symmetry, under which the additio… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(129 reference statements)
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Non observation of DM in direct search experiments like LUX [25], XENON 1T [25][26][27], Panda X [28] put a stringent bound on this model (with mass below 1 TeV getting disallowed) due to its prediction of large spin independent (SI) direct search cross section. As an alternative, multi-component DM scenarios [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48] are proposed where DM-DM interactions (see for example, [39,40]) play an important role to evade direct search bound.Such an attempt was made in [39], where two singlet scalars serve as two DM components, that satisfy required DM constraints. However, the framework is unable to accommodate the low mass region corresponding to both the DM's masses, simultaneously below 500 GeV, to satisfy DM direct search bounds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non observation of DM in direct search experiments like LUX [25], XENON 1T [25][26][27], Panda X [28] put a stringent bound on this model (with mass below 1 TeV getting disallowed) due to its prediction of large spin independent (SI) direct search cross section. As an alternative, multi-component DM scenarios [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48] are proposed where DM-DM interactions (see for example, [39,40]) play an important role to evade direct search bound.Such an attempt was made in [39], where two singlet scalars serve as two DM components, that satisfy required DM constraints. However, the framework is unable to accommodate the low mass region corresponding to both the DM's masses, simultaneously below 500 GeV, to satisfy DM direct search bounds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Motivated by the two problems in the SM, we consider a popular DM scenario based on vector like fermions along with an extended gauge symmetry which not only stabilise DM but also plays a role in generating light neutrino masses along with the additional incentive of enhanced detection aspects. The DM is an admixture of a vector like singlet fermion and neutral component of a vector like SU (2) L doublet fermion, popularly known singlet-doublet fermion DM [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. Typically, vector like fermion (VLF) dark matter in such scenarios are stabilised by an in-built Z 2 symmetry under which DM is odd while all SM particles are even.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though a single component DM is a very minimal and predictive scenario to begin with, a richer dark sector may in fact be natural given the complicated visible sector. There have been several proposals for multi-component WIMP dark matter during last few years, some of which can be found in [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51]. Going from single component to multi-component DM sector can significantly alter the direct as well as indirect detection rates for DM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%