2017
DOI: 10.1002/ejhf.989
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiparametric prognostic scores in chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a long‐term comparison

Abstract: In this cohort, the prognostic accuracy of the MECKI score was superior to that of HFSS and SHFM at 2- and 4-year follow-up in HF patients in stable clinical condition. The MECKI score may be useful to improve resource allocation and patient outcome, but prospective evaluation is needed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
67
0
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

7
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
67
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The 10‐year survival analysis was then repeated taking into account the potential confounding role of peak VO 2 expressed as mL/min/kg and of VE/VCO 2 slope ( Figure B and C ), indicating a steady improvement over time independently of peak VO 2 and VE/VCO 2 slope. When data were normalized for clinical variables, such as peak VO 2 , VE/VCO 2 slope, Na + , kidney function by means of MDRD formula, and haemoglobin — all known to be independent survival predictors — results were unchanged. However, when also treatment variables — which resulted significantly different between groups (such as ICD, CRT, ACE inhibitors, beta‐blockers, aldosterone antagonists) — were added, Kaplan–Meier survival curves showed an unchanged trend, but statistical difference was observed only between group 1 and the other groups.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The 10‐year survival analysis was then repeated taking into account the potential confounding role of peak VO 2 expressed as mL/min/kg and of VE/VCO 2 slope ( Figure B and C ), indicating a steady improvement over time independently of peak VO 2 and VE/VCO 2 slope. When data were normalized for clinical variables, such as peak VO 2 , VE/VCO 2 slope, Na + , kidney function by means of MDRD formula, and haemoglobin — all known to be independent survival predictors — results were unchanged. However, when also treatment variables — which resulted significantly different between groups (such as ICD, CRT, ACE inhibitors, beta‐blockers, aldosterone antagonists) — were added, Kaplan–Meier survival curves showed an unchanged trend, but statistical difference was observed only between group 1 and the other groups.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Normally and non-normally distributed numeric and categorical variables are presented as mean ± standard deviation, as median [interquartile range (IQR)], or as frequency (%), and they were compared With follow-up arbitrarily truncated at 10 years, event-free survival in the different time ranges was estimated by Kaplan-Meier curves and by Cox regression models unadjusted and adjusted for peak VO 2 expressed as mL/min/kg, for VE/VCO 2 slope, for the combination of clinical variables known to be independently associated with prognosis -peak VO 2 , VE/VCO 2 slope, Na + , LVEF, kidney function by means of Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula, and haemoglobin 11,12 -and for the same variables plus treatment strategies [e.g. implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, beta-blockers, aldosterone antagonists], which resulted different between groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Numerous scores have been derived and validated for both acute heart failure and outpatients. Selected prognostic scores for advanced but non‐hospitalized heart failure include the Heart Failure Survival Score (HFSS), the Seattle Heart Failure Model (SHFM), the Metabolic Exercise test data combined with Cardiac and Kidney Indexes (MECKI) score, and the Meta‐Analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure (MAGGIC) ( Table ). The SHFM has been shown to underestimate the risk of decompensation and indication for left ventricular assist device (LVAD) in patients with advanced heart failure .…”
Section: Prognostic Stratificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a long-term registry of chronic heart failure, patients with reduced ejection fraction were compared to multiparametric prognostic scores, and the MECKI (Metabolic Excercise test data combined with Cardiac and Kidney Indexes) score was superior to other tested scores [26]. Also, regarding our registry, NGAL should be included in the multi-biomarker approach to set prognosis more precisely.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%