2009
DOI: 10.4076/1757-1626-2-8358
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiorgan paradoxical embolism consequent to acute pulmonary thromboembolism with patent foramen ovale: a case report

Abstract: Paradoxical embolism is defined as a systemic arterial embolism requiring the passage of a venous thrombus into the arterial circulatory system through a right-to-left shunt. It is a relatively rare phenomenon, representing about 2% of all cases of arterial embolism. We report a case of a 79-years-old woman admitted to hospital because of dyspnea and lower left limb pain. CT scan revealed multiple thrombi to kidney, lower limb and superior mesenteric artery during acute pulmonary embolism. Echocardiogram docum… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mechanism of the renal infarction in our case was considered that transiently increased right arterial hypertension, due to acute pulmonary embolism induced continuous opening of PFO and permitted a passage of the thrombi in deep vein into the arterial system 11). It should also be noted that though there have been several case reports of systemic PDEs with PTE associated with PFO,7)8)13) cases of non-cerebral, systemic PDEs, associated with PFO, are relatively lower than for cerebral PDEs. One report showed that only 2.9% of patients with PFO presented with a presumptive diagnosis of systemic embolism,14) though when patients with major pulmonary embolism have PFO, the incidence of peripheral artery embolisms, can significantly be increased (up to 15%) 15)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…The mechanism of the renal infarction in our case was considered that transiently increased right arterial hypertension, due to acute pulmonary embolism induced continuous opening of PFO and permitted a passage of the thrombi in deep vein into the arterial system 11). It should also be noted that though there have been several case reports of systemic PDEs with PTE associated with PFO,7)8)13) cases of non-cerebral, systemic PDEs, associated with PFO, are relatively lower than for cerebral PDEs. One report showed that only 2.9% of patients with PFO presented with a presumptive diagnosis of systemic embolism,14) though when patients with major pulmonary embolism have PFO, the incidence of peripheral artery embolisms, can significantly be increased (up to 15%) 15)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…In that case, the patient was initially treated with TPA given her hemodynamic stability and no contraindications to thrombolysis. PFO closure was not performed because long-lasting oral anticoagulation therapy was necessary given the absence of a demonstrated source of systemic emboli [16]. Another study reported by Islam et al [17] described a case of PDE with PFO simultaneously involving four organ systems: pulmonary circulation, cerebrum, left upper extremity, and the coronary artery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PFO may be associated with arterial embolisation to the gastrointestinal system, upper or lower limbs, or the coronary circulation (presenting as acute myocardial infarction), to name a few. [36][37][38] Selected cases of a paradoxical systemic embolus in younger patients with an absence for risk factors of atherosclerosis may be potential indications for PFO closure and should be referred to the MDT, if no other source of embolisation can be elucidated.…”
Section: Systemic Embolismmentioning
confidence: 99%