Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2021
DOI: 10.1103/physrevaccelbeams.24.014601
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiobjective optimization of the dynamic aperture using surrogate models based on artificial neural networks

Abstract: Modern synchrotron light source storage rings, such as the Swiss Light Source upgrade (SLS 2.0), use multi-bend achromats in their arc segments to achieve unprecedented brilliance. This performance comes at the cost of increased focusing requirements, which in turn require stronger sextupole and higher-order multipole fields for compensation and lead to a considerable decrease in the dynamic aperture and/or energy acceptance. In this paper, to increase these two quantities, a multi-objective genetic algorithm … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(65 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, we used an improved multi-objective optimizer based on the differential evolution method in the accelerator global beam dynamics design optimization. In the future study, we would like to further improve the computational speed in the global design optimization by exploring methods to include surrogate models in the optimizer [34,35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we used an improved multi-objective optimizer based on the differential evolution method in the accelerator global beam dynamics design optimization. In the future study, we would like to further improve the computational speed in the global design optimization by exploring methods to include surrogate models in the optimizer [34,35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neural network-based surrogate models can be trained to quickly map between accelerator parameters and beam properties, providing faster estimates than possible with computationally expensive physics models. Surrogate models can also be used to generate data sets for ML training and for optimization studies [253][254][255][256][257][258][259].…”
Section: G Charged Particle Beamsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To reduce the computational cost, machine learning (ML) techniques have recently inspired a surge of applications to DA evaluation, especially in the time-consuming DA optimization studies [29][30][31][32][33]. These proposals focus mainly on learning the map between the magnetic lattice settings of the storage ring (e.g., the strengths of magnets) and the corresponding DA size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, the ML model often predicts accurately for a small variation range in the variable space and/or for a small number of control variables. Although this limitation can be mitigated to some degree by continuously retraining the ML model with new data samples (will take extra computing time) [33], one needs to always concern about the DA prediction accuracy when applying the ML model to a new storage ring design, whose lattice settings are away from the distribution of the existing training data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%