Thermodynamic Analysis and Optimization of Geothermal Power Plants 2021
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-821037-6.00011-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiobjective optimization of a geothermal power plant

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, if one set of solutions in the diagram is presented in the form of design variations, then there are 70 sets of MCC design solutions that do not dominate each other. The meaning of not dominating each other is certainly related to the compromise value that is in accordance with the optimization objectives without reducing the ability of one of the output variables [55], [56]. Furthermore, the 70 sets of solutions were analyzed in greater depth through equal weighting.…”
Section: Ann-moga Optimization Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, if one set of solutions in the diagram is presented in the form of design variations, then there are 70 sets of MCC design solutions that do not dominate each other. The meaning of not dominating each other is certainly related to the compromise value that is in accordance with the optimization objectives without reducing the ability of one of the output variables [55], [56]. Furthermore, the 70 sets of solutions were analyzed in greater depth through equal weighting.…”
Section: Ann-moga Optimization Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The set of Pareto optimal solutions obtained is referred to as Pareto set, and its image is referred to as the Pareto front [40,41].…”
Section: Pareto Front Multiobjective Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%