2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.04.10.035584
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiobjective Optimization Identifies Cancer-Selective Combination Therapies

Abstract: Combinatorial therapies are required to treat patients with advanced cancers that have become resistant to monotherapies through rewiring of redundant pathways. Due to a massive number of potential drug combinations, there is a need for systematic approaches to identify safe and effective combinations for each patient, using cost-effective methods. Here, we developed an exact multiobjective optimization method for identifying pairwise or higher-order combinations that show maximal cancer-selectivity.

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 32 publications
(31 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, most preclinical screening efforts emphasize merely the combination synergy as key determinant of the drug combination performance [ 7 ], even though cancer cell selectivity is critical for the clinical success of combinatorial therapies [ 8 ]. This leads to the translational challenge that requires careful assessment of potential toxic effects along with synergistic efficacy, as there is a fundamental trade-off between treatment efficacy and tolerable toxicity [ 9 ]. To date, there has been a lack of computational approaches that could address these experimental and translational challenges: (i) identifying among the massive number of potential drug combinations those that simultaneously show both maximal therapeutic potential and cancer selectivity, and (ii) bridging the gap to the clinical practice to enable real-world applications in translational studies and to establish their potential utility in clinical decision-making process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, most preclinical screening efforts emphasize merely the combination synergy as key determinant of the drug combination performance [ 7 ], even though cancer cell selectivity is critical for the clinical success of combinatorial therapies [ 8 ]. This leads to the translational challenge that requires careful assessment of potential toxic effects along with synergistic efficacy, as there is a fundamental trade-off between treatment efficacy and tolerable toxicity [ 9 ]. To date, there has been a lack of computational approaches that could address these experimental and translational challenges: (i) identifying among the massive number of potential drug combinations those that simultaneously show both maximal therapeutic potential and cancer selectivity, and (ii) bridging the gap to the clinical practice to enable real-world applications in translational studies and to establish their potential utility in clinical decision-making process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%