2021
DOI: 10.1115/1.4052444
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiobjective Monotonicity Analysis: Pareto Set Dependency and Trade-Offs Causality in Configuration Design

Abstract: Multiobjective design optimization studies typically derive Pareto sets or use a scalar substitute function to capture design trade-offs, leaving it up to the designer's intuition to use this information for design refinements and decision making. Understanding the causality of trade-offs more deeply, beyond simple post-optimality parametric studies, would be particularly valuable in configuration design problems to guide configuration redesign. This paper presents the method of Multiobjective Monotonicity Ana… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(73 reference statements)
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…See [30,31] for an overview of the upper bound formulation (also known as ε-constraint), the underlying mathematics, and how to define limits for ε. As discussed in [28], this formulation has some computational limitations but its use here benefits the proposed analysis.…”
Section: Theoretical Foundationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…See [30,31] for an overview of the upper bound formulation (also known as ε-constraint), the underlying mathematics, and how to define limits for ε. As discussed in [28], this formulation has some computational limitations but its use here benefits the proposed analysis.…”
Section: Theoretical Foundationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [28], these principles were applied to derive the Multiobjective Monotonicity Analysis (MOMA) process for rigorous identification of the dependencies that cause trade-offs between objectives in problems of the form shown in Eqs. 6-9.…”
Section: Theoretical Foundationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations