2015
DOI: 10.1109/tia.2015.2429113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiobjective Modulated Model Predictive Control for a Multilevel Solid-State Transformer

Abstract: A note on versions:The version presented here may differ from the published version or from the version of record. If you wish to cite this item you are advised to consult the publisher's version. Please see the repository url above for details on accessing the published version and note that access may require a subscription.For more information, please contact eprints@nottingham.ac.uk

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(65 reference statements)
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The cost function minimization procedure acts also as a modulator, by selecting the best vectors and their application times for the next sampling period. A similar solution has already been proposed in [31]- [33] for a Multilevel Cascaded H-Bridge Converter, in [34], [35] for a Direct Matrix Converter and in [36] for a three phase Active Filter . Experimental results show the excellent transient and steady state performance of the proposed system.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The cost function minimization procedure acts also as a modulator, by selecting the best vectors and their application times for the next sampling period. A similar solution has already been proposed in [31]- [33] for a Multilevel Cascaded H-Bridge Converter, in [34], [35] for a Direct Matrix Converter and in [36] for a three phase Active Filter . Experimental results show the excellent transient and steady state performance of the proposed system.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The variable switching frequency produces a spread spectrum, decreasing the performance of the system in terms of power quality. This problem has been recently solved by using predictive control to emulate the implementation of PWM or space vector modulation (SVM) with a linear PI controller [44], [45].…”
Section: Limitations Weaknesses and Future Trends In Predictive Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, the above two approaches cannot achieve the line current control and capacitor voltage balancing at the same time. In order to solve this problem, in [16] and [17], the term of capacitor voltage balancing is included in the cost function. This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%