2003
DOI: 10.1007/0-306-48107-3_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiobjective Combinatorial Optimization — Theory, Methodology, and Applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
57
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 273 publications
0
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2). Existing multiobjective formulations of classical combinatorial optimization problems with binary variables include multiobjective linear assignment problems [24,28], multiobjective knapsack problems [29,30], multiobjective maxcut problems [31], or multiobjective set covering and partitioning problems [28], just to mention a few. Nevertheless, the objective functions of such formulations are linear, and not quadratic as in mUBQP.…”
Section: Links With Existing Problem Formulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2). Existing multiobjective formulations of classical combinatorial optimization problems with binary variables include multiobjective linear assignment problems [24,28], multiobjective knapsack problems [29,30], multiobjective maxcut problems [31], or multiobjective set covering and partitioning problems [28], just to mention a few. Nevertheless, the objective functions of such formulations are linear, and not quadratic as in mUBQP.…”
Section: Links With Existing Problem Formulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 and 6, and OF s are described in scenario details, the tool generates multi-objective optimized enactment plans which consider both maximizing profit and minimizing waiting time. In this way, the tool suggests: a resource for executing each activity, the start and end time of the activities, and the services which will be offered to each client (i.e., services which were not booked by the client) 9 . The generated optimized plans are then used to support the salon director in managing the working day in an optimized way.…”
Section: Condec-r Specificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5) can be found. To solve multi-objective optimization problems (for more information, the reader is referred to [9]), there are, basically, three approaches: (i) defining a new objective function (i.e., combining the original objective functions) which can be optimized with single objective solvers (e.g., the weighted-sum method [1]), (ii) optimizing one of the objective functions constraining the other ones (e.g., ε-constraint method [13]), and (iii) working with a set of Pareto optimal solutions (e.g., evolutionary multi-objective optimization [6]). In this work, the ε-constraint method [13] is applied since it appeared well suited for our purposes and typically provides good results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Epsilon Constraint Method is one of the common approaches for dealing with multiobjective problems, which solves such problems by considering all objective functions as constraints and retaining only one of them in each phase as the main objective function (Ehrgott & Gandibleux, 2002). In this case, Pareto Border can be constructed by ε constraint method (Bérubé et al 2009).…”
Section: Solution Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%