Multiobjective approach developed for optimizing the dynamic behavior of incremental linear actuators

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to develop an optimal approach for optimizing the dynamic behavior of incremental linear actuators. Design/methodology/approach – First, a parameterized design model is built. Second, a dynamic model is implemented. This model takes into account the thrust force computed from a finite element model. Finally, the multiobjective optimization approach is applied to the dynamic model to optimize control as well as design parameters. Findings – The Pareto front resulting from the optimization approach (or the parallel optimization approach,) is better than the Pareto, which is obtained from the only application of MultiObjective Genetic Algorithm (MOGA) method (or parallel MOGA with the same number of optimization approach objective function evaluations). The only use of MOGA can reach the region near an optimal Pareto front, but it consumes more computing time than the multiobjective optimization approach. At each flowchart stage, parallelization leads to a significant reduction of computing time which is halved when using two-core machine. Originality/value – In order to solve the multiobjective problem, a hybrid algorithm based on MOGA is developed.

Design and Optimization of Tubular Linear Permanent Magnet Generator with Performance Improvement Using Response Surface Methodology and Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithm

“…Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithm (MOGA)'s single use can stretch to the area near an optimal Pareto front; however, it requires more computing time when compared with the multi-objective optimization approach. Parallelization causes a considerable decrease in computing time at each flowchart stage [22]. In this study, the software, called AnsysMaxwell2D, was used in the design calculation of tubular linear generator.…”

Multi-objective enhanced PSO algorithm for optimizing power losses and voltage deviation in power systems

“…However, Multi-objective evolutionary computation techniques are well suitable for solving MO problems because their population-based methodology can find the universal Pareto optimum solutions in a single simulation run (Basu, 2011;Yang et al, 2009;Abido, 2009;Amdouni et al, 2014). In recent years, strengthened Pareto evolutionary algorithm, adaptive multiple evolutionary algorithm and improved Pareto archived evolution strategy have been used to solve MVARD problems (Abido and Bakhashwain, 2005;Montoya et al, 2010;Li et al, 2014).…”