2001
DOI: 10.1191/147108201128104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multinomial logit random effects models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
100
0
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
100
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…We then entered variables into the mixed-effect multinomial logistic model by forward selection with alpha set at 0.10 for variable inclusion or removal (Hartzel et al 2001;Sergio et al 2003). Social behavior was the dependant variable and had three categories.…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We then entered variables into the mixed-effect multinomial logistic model by forward selection with alpha set at 0.10 for variable inclusion or removal (Hartzel et al 2001;Sergio et al 2003). Social behavior was the dependant variable and had three categories.…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multinomial random effects models have previously been treated as special cases of multivariate generalized linear mixed models (MGLMMs) (Tutz and Hennevogl 1996;Hartzel et al 2001). We also adopt this general approach as it provides unified fitting and inferential procedures for a broad class of models.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, the NP approach yields fairly efficient estimates of the effects of the explanatory variables and it has been used extensively by statisticians. For instance, Aitkin (1999) used this approach in the context of generalized linear models and Hartzel et al (2001) for modeling correlated multinomial responses. General fitting algorithms have been provided by Laird (1978), Lindsay (1983), Follmann andLambert (1989) and Lesperance and Kalbfleisch (1992).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several further additions and variants may be included in these models and we quote the possibility to express the effects of subjects' covariates on the shelter choice (as pursued by Iannario and Piccolo 2010b in a real case study) or to extend our proposal in a multilevel framework (Iannario 2011b), as it would be convenient for assessing variations among and within subgroups of ordinal data sets (see Hartzel et al 2001;Grilli and Rampichini 2002;Fielding et al 2003, among others). number E61J10000020001, both within the Research Unit at University of Naples Federico II.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%