2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.shaw.2019.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multimorbidity and Its Impact on Workers: A Review of Longitudinal Studies

Abstract: ObjectiveThis study investigates the impact of multimorbidity on work through a literature review of longitudinal studies.MethodsA systematic review was carried out in the databases Lilacs, SciELO, PAHO, PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane. There were no restrictions regarding the year of publication or language to maximize the identification of relevant literature. The quality of studies was assessed by the protocol STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
36
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Multimorbidity has a negative impact on the workforce, affecting productivity and increasing absenteeism. Employability also decreases with multimorbidity because employers tend not to hire those who are ill. All this also affects the quality of life of workers and deteriorates the overall country economy [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multimorbidity has a negative impact on the workforce, affecting productivity and increasing absenteeism. Employability also decreases with multimorbidity because employers tend not to hire those who are ill. All this also affects the quality of life of workers and deteriorates the overall country economy [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The global burden of multimorbidity is well-established [3]. Multimorbidity is significantly associated with lower worker productivity [4], higher risk of polypharmacy [5,6], impaired functioning [7], frailty [8], poor quality of life [9], substantial higher healthcare use [10][11][12], increased healthcare costs [13,14], and increased risk of death [15]. A systematic review has concluded that multimorbidity is highly prevalent [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following variables were included as covariates: year, age, gender, marital status (married and partnered, and otherwise), residency (rural or urban), Hukou (household registration system) status (agricultural Hukou or non-agricultural Hukou), geographical region (east China, middle China, west China, northeast China), family size, education (illiterate, primary school, secondary school, college and above), SES quartile (using household consumption expenditures per capita as a proxy of permanent income, Q1 being the poorest and Q4 being the richest), and work type (farming, formally employed, self-employed, family business, unemployed, retired, never worked). The included socio-demographic characteristics are those demonstrated to be associated with disability and productivity outcomes in the literature [ 3 , 24 , 27 , 41 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature on the economic impact of mental-physical multimorbidity is relatively sparse in a LMIC setting, where the prevalence and pattern of mental-physical multimorbidity, and the ability of its health care system and social support service (such as health insurance, unemployment insurance, sick leave benefits) in mitigating the potential combined impact of physical illness and mental disorder on health and economic outcomes might be different. A recent systematic review that examined the effect of multimorbidity on productivity [ 27 ], showed that almost all previous studies were from high-income countries except one from Egypt [ 28 ]. However, the study in Egypt did not examine the combined effect of mental and physical chronic conditions on work productivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%