2017
DOI: 10.1175/jamc-d-16-0284.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multimodel Ensemble Sea Level Forecasts for Tropical Pacific Islands

Abstract: Sea level anomaly extremes impact tropical Pacific Ocean islands, often with too little warning to mitigate risks. With El Niño, such as the strong 2015/16 event, comes weaker trade winds and mean sea level drops exceeding 30 cm in the western Pacific that expose shallow-water ecosystems at low tides. Nearly opposite climate conditions accompany La Niña events, which cause sea level high stands (10–20 cm) and result in more frequent tide- and storm-related inundations that threaten coastlines. In the past, the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, the models used for projections do not start from an observed state, and hence, the representation of interannual variability is not expected to be in phase across the multimodel ensemble, which means that averaging across many climate models in developing SLR projections tends to cancel out the interannual variability (e.g., McInnes et al, ). High‐resolution climate simulations initialized with observed states can provide better short‐term predictions including a wider range of the full seasonal to interannual variability, but forecasting skills vary from region to region depending on the extent to which the dominant modes of variability are captured in the model or not (McIntosh et al, ; Miles et al, ; Roberts et al, ; Widlansky et al, ). For example, the skill of forecasts for sea levels is low in extratropical regions because of the inherent ocean variability and because of the limited predictability of wind and atmospheric variability in these regions (Roberts et al, ).…”
Section: Meeting the Identified Needsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, the models used for projections do not start from an observed state, and hence, the representation of interannual variability is not expected to be in phase across the multimodel ensemble, which means that averaging across many climate models in developing SLR projections tends to cancel out the interannual variability (e.g., McInnes et al, ). High‐resolution climate simulations initialized with observed states can provide better short‐term predictions including a wider range of the full seasonal to interannual variability, but forecasting skills vary from region to region depending on the extent to which the dominant modes of variability are captured in the model or not (McIntosh et al, ; Miles et al, ; Roberts et al, ; Widlansky et al, ). For example, the skill of forecasts for sea levels is low in extratropical regions because of the inherent ocean variability and because of the limited predictability of wind and atmospheric variability in these regions (Roberts et al, ).…”
Section: Meeting the Identified Needsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) has recently provided experimental annual flood predictions that consider past trends, and in some locations, interannual variability with the El Niño Southern Oscillation [45]. This allows for statistical-dynamical tidal-flood [46,47] and sea level anomaly [48] predictions, enabling uses to improve readiness for current and future flooding. These products complement mid-and longer-term climate services such as NOAA's SLR Viewer web mapping tool [49], that support community decision making around infrastructure plans and designs that consider performance and reliability for local relative SLR up to 100 years in the future.…”
Section: Example 1: Usa Coastal Climate Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Harmonics were calculated from the NTDE as a whole, rather than performing the calculations year by year. While there are typically some variations between different tidal prediction products, such as from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Center for Operational Oceanographic Products and Services, we found our procedure to describe well the observed tidal oscillations at Honolulu and for other locations with sufficiently long records (Widlansky et al, ).…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 84%