2015
DOI: 10.1080/18756891.2015.1061396
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multimodel biometrics Fusion based on FAR and FRR using Triangular Norm

Abstract: Multibiomitric systems are expected to be more accurate due to the presence of multiple evidences, score level fusion is the most commonly used approach in multibiometrics. In this paper, A novel approach is proposed for the fusion at score level fusion based on False Reject Rate(FRR) and False Accept Rate(FRR) using triangular norms(t-norms). This study aims at tapping the potential of t-norms for information fusion at first, at the second, it transfers scores into Transfer function based on corresponding FRR… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
(11 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In conclusion, the transformation-based fusion approach, with no training process and few consideration of distribution of matching scores and it is easy to implement [7]. On the contrary, density-based fusion method, which requires accurate estimation of density and huge number of training samples, is hard to carry out for the following reasons: firstly, positive samples, namely genuine matching scores are limited in today's multi-biometric systems, secondly, it is difficult to estimate the density of matching scores in that they may not obey a certain distribution model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In conclusion, the transformation-based fusion approach, with no training process and few consideration of distribution of matching scores and it is easy to implement [7]. On the contrary, density-based fusion method, which requires accurate estimation of density and huge number of training samples, is hard to carry out for the following reasons: firstly, positive samples, namely genuine matching scores are limited in today's multi-biometric systems, secondly, it is difficult to estimate the density of matching scores in that they may not obey a certain distribution model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%