Contrary to the infrequency in extraocular disease presentation in high-income countries, extraocular disease can be up to 50% of retinoblastoma cases in low-income countries. 1 Though the prognosis has been improved by the incorporation of intensive multimodality treatments, metastatic retinoblastoma with central nervous system (CNS) involvement is still fatal.Anthracyclines, specifically doxorubicin, have been used and are active 2 for the treatment of extraocular retinoblastoma without CNS invasion though some treatment regimens for high-risk retinoblastoma exclude the use of this class of drugs. 3,4 In the 1990s, we published an upfront phase II window study of idarubicin in patients with extraocular retinoblastoma showing a 60% response rate. 5 Idarubicin is less cardiotoxic compared to doxorubicin, and its higher lipophilicity favors penetration across the blood-brain barrier. The in vivo production of idarubicinol, the main active metabolite equipotent to the parent drug in human tumor cell lines, also favors idarubicin compared with doxorubicin. 6,7 Hence, idarubicin became the anthracycline chosen for prospective studies in our group. 8,9 Despite excellent results with this regimen, its widespread use in other middle-income countries is limited by the poor commercial availability and high costs. Thus, it is debatable whether it would be justified to use idarubicin instead of doxorubicin for patients with high-risk retinoblastoma.Thus, we compared the growth-inhibitory activity of idarubicin and doxorubicin in patient-derived cell lines and the commercial cell line of retinoblastoma Y79. The patient-derived cell lines were established from an intraocular tumor after upfront enucleation of a treatment-naïve patient (HPG-12I) and from the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) relapsed of a metastatic patient heavily treated (HPG-CSF-1). Cells were exposed to increasing concentrations of drugs, and thereafter cell viability was assessed using MTT. The concentration of doxorubicin or idarubicin that caused a 50% decrease in cell proliferation (IC 50 ) was calculated.Idarubicin IC 50 was 7-to 8-fold lower than the IC 50 of doxorubicin in HPG-CSF-1 and Y79 cell lines (Table 1). However, this difference was smaller in the cell line HPG-12I, in which the IC 50 was 1.7-fold the value for doxorubicin IC 50 in accordance with previous studies that showed the equipotency of both anthracyclines. 10 Assuming a proportional increase in drug exposure with the dose, this result may imply that doxorubicin dosage should be increased 7 to 8 times to obtain a comparable antitumor activity if cells from high-risk patients are considered. Then, for 10 mg/m 2 of idarubicin or the cumulative dosage of 40 mg/m 2 used in the GALOP protocol, each dosage of doxorubicin should be 70 to 80 mg/m 2 , reaching 280 to 320 mg/m 2 for TA B L E 1 Anthracycline cytotoxic activity in retinoblastoma cell lines Cell line/drug Doxorubicin IC 50 , nM (SE) Idarubicin IC 50 , nM (SE) IC 50 ratio Y79 502.6 (1.0) 58.9 (1.1) 8.5 HPG-12I 7.4 (1.1) 4.3 (1.1) 1.7 HPG-...