2015
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01547
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multimodal theories of recognition and their relation to Molyneux's question

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(21 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For earlier discussion of this 'common-coding' proposal and its relation to Molyneux's question, seeAltieri 2015, Schwenkler 2015 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For earlier discussion of this 'common-coding' proposal and its relation to Molyneux's question, seeAltieri 2015, Schwenkler 2015 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Akin to MQ, I previously argued that common code theory predicts that newly sighted individuals should experience the McGurk effect—perhaps at a rate similar to typically developing adults (cf. Altieri, 2015 ; The canonical effect occurs when auditory/ba/is presented with a speaker's face articulating “ga”; listeners, typically hear a fused consonant such as “da” rather than/ba/).…”
Section: Problems With Common Code Theory?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, differences would support either modular (cf. Altieri, 2015 ) or possibly empiricist theories.…”
Section: Problems With Common Code Theory?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Altieri ( 2015 ) discusses the relevance of experimental work on cross-modal recognition to a question raised by the Irish politician William Molyneux and discussed in John Locke's Essay Concerning Human Understanding : “Suppose a man born blind, and now adult, and taught by his touch to distinguish between a Cube, and a Sphere …, so as to tell, when he felt one and t'other, which is the Cube, which the Sphere. Suppose then the Cube and Sphere placed on a Table, and the Blind Man to be made to see.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%