2016
DOI: 10.1109/tip.2015.2496275
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multimodal Task-Driven Dictionary Learning for Image Classification

Abstract: Dictionary learning algorithms have been successfully used for both reconstructive and discriminative tasks, where an input signal is represented with a sparse linear combination of dictionary atoms. While these methods are mostly developed for single-modality scenarios, recent studies have demonstrated the advantages of feature-level fusion based on the joint sparse representation of the multimodal inputs. In this paper, we propose a multimodal task-driven dictionary learning algorithm under the joint sparsit… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
109
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
109
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gain [18] are among the most representative algorithms. (2) Wrapper methods, which use the prediction method as a black box to score the feature subsets, such as correlation-based feature selection (CFS) [19] and support vector machine recursive feature elimination (SVM-RFE) [20]. (3) Embedded methods, which directly incorporate the feature selection procedure into the model training process, such as regularized regressionbased feature selection methods [21], [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gain [18] are among the most representative algorithms. (2) Wrapper methods, which use the prediction method as a black box to score the feature subsets, such as correlation-based feature selection (CFS) [19] and support vector machine recursive feature elimination (SVM-RFE) [20]. (3) Embedded methods, which directly incorporate the feature selection procedure into the model training process, such as regularized regressionbased feature selection methods [21], [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such coding strategies has already been successfully used in face recognition and identity validation. 61 Very recently, Liu et al 62 attempted to develop joint sparse coding method for visual-tactile fusion and solved the intrinsic weakly pairing problem by relaxing the joint coding requirements. In the left panel of Figure 10, we list some representative experimental objects.…”
Section: Visual-tactile Fusion For Object Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another possible direction toward feature fusion is to exploit the notion of joint sparse representations or learn multi-modal dictionaries based on joint sparsity constraints. Based on these techniques, the authors in [31], [32] managed to fuse the information from various biometrics in order to perform more accurate face verification. A similar approach is to perform joint dimensionality reduction and project the multiple features on a common subspace.…”
Section: B Multi-modal Fusionmentioning
confidence: 99%