2017
DOI: 10.1101/178962
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multimodal Surface Matching with Higher-Order Smoothness Constraints

Abstract: In brain imaging, accurate alignment of cortical surfaces is fundamental to the statistical sensitivity and spatial localisation of group studies; and cortical surface-based alignment has generally been accepted to be superior

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
98
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
98
0
Order By: Relevance
“…White and pial cortical surfaces were 19 reconstructed from the structural scans using the HCP Pipelines (Glasser et al, 2013). Surfaces were 20 aligned across subjects to the HCP 32k fs_LR standard surface space using first a gentle folding-based 21 registration 'MSMSulc' and then a more aggressive areal-feature-based registration 'MSMAll' that was 22 driven by myelin maps, resting-state network maps, and 3T resting-state visuotopic maps (Robinson et 23 al., 2014;Glasser et al, 2016;Robinson et al, 2018). Myelin maps were based on the ratio of T1w/T2w 24 images (Glasser and Van Essen, 2011), normalized using a surface-based atlas to estimate B1+ transmit 25 effects (Glasser et al, 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…White and pial cortical surfaces were 19 reconstructed from the structural scans using the HCP Pipelines (Glasser et al, 2013). Surfaces were 20 aligned across subjects to the HCP 32k fs_LR standard surface space using first a gentle folding-based 21 registration 'MSMSulc' and then a more aggressive areal-feature-based registration 'MSMAll' that was 22 driven by myelin maps, resting-state network maps, and 3T resting-state visuotopic maps (Robinson et 23 al., 2014;Glasser et al, 2016;Robinson et al, 2018). Myelin maps were based on the ratio of T1w/T2w 24 images (Glasser and Van Essen, 2011), normalized using a surface-based atlas to estimate B1+ transmit 25 effects (Glasser et al, 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pre-processed time-series data (CIFTI format) reflect MSMAll-alignment of individual subjects to the 15 fs_LR surface (Glasser et al, 2013;Robinson et al, 2018). The pRF model solutions are obtained by 16 fitting each CIFTI grayordinate independently; thus, there are no additional spatial transformations 17 applied.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Significant advances have already been made in recent years in order to tackle the issue of spatial misalignment across individuals. For example, the HCP data used in this work were spatially aligned using the multimodal surface mapping (MSM) technique, which achieves very good functional alignment by using features that are more closely tied to cortical areas (although note that, since the time of the HCP release, refinements to the [regularisation of the] MSM algorithm have resulted in further improvements in the observed functional alignment of HCP data (Robinson et al, 2014(Robinson et al, , 2017 ). Therefore, gross misalignment is unlikely to play a role in our results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of this behaviourally meaningful spatial variability is somewhat surprising, because these data were aligned using a Multimodal Surface Matching (MSM) approach (Robinson et al, 2014(Robinson et al, , 2017 , driven by both structural and functional cortical features (including myelin maps and resting state network maps). MSM has been shown to achieve very good functional alignment compared with other methods, and particularly compared with volumetric alignment approaches or surface-based approaches that use cortical folding patterns rather than areal features (Coalson, Van Essen, & Glasser, n.d.) .…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation