2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2022.104182
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multimodal model with text and drug embeddings for adverse drug reaction classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Multimodal language models jointly trained on English text and biological sequence data have already been used to identify protein-protein interactions [73], classify adverse reactions to drugs [74], and caption molecules [75]. The multimodal scientific language model Galactica was also trained on protein sequences [76].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multimodal language models jointly trained on English text and biological sequence data have already been used to identify protein-protein interactions [73], classify adverse reactions to drugs [74], and caption molecules [75]. The multimodal scientific language model Galactica was also trained on protein sequences [76].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Sakhovskiy et al 42 proposes a multi-modal model with state-of-the-art BERT-based models for language understanding and molecular property prediction.…”
Section: Baseline Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lee et al 26 and Chowdhury et al 40 only provide the results on PSB2016. Meanwhile, Chen et al 41 and Sakhovskiy et al 42 only verify their model on SMM4H2018. However, our model and Li et al 11 perform experiments on both PSB2016 and SMM4H2018.…”
Section: Performance Comparison Of Our Methods and Other Existing Met...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use the annotated data of the ADE Extraction Task of the SMM4H 2020 shared task, which contains 1862 tweets, 1080 of which are positive for the presence of ADEs while the remaining 782 are negative. Similarly to previous works [56,57], we only use the annotated samples provided by the shared task (training and validation set) and not the blind test set for our analyses. The evaluation on the blind test set is available through the CodaLab platform 3 , however CodaLab allows for a limited number of test runs.…”
Section: Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%