2015
DOI: 10.14689/ejer.2015.61.3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multimodal Literacy Scale: A Study of Validity and Reliability

Abstract: Problem Statement: Most structures of the texts individuals encounter today are multimodal, in which written, visual, and auditory elements are used together. Students who spend most of their time on social networks or playing various computer games gain experience in multimodal environments. As a part of teacher training, it is important that teachers who prepare students for life and set an example have multimodal literacy skills by keeping up with advancing technology. Purpose of Study:The study, carried ou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(18 reference statements)
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Multimodal literacy scale has been devised by Bulut, Ulu & Kan (2015). After the exploratory factor analysis, the researchers have concluded that the scale is comprised of thee sub-dimensions (expressing oneself by using multimodal structures, interpretation of the contents presented in multimodal structures and preferring multimodal structures).…”
Section: Data Collection Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Multimodal literacy scale has been devised by Bulut, Ulu & Kan (2015). After the exploratory factor analysis, the researchers have concluded that the scale is comprised of thee sub-dimensions (expressing oneself by using multimodal structures, interpretation of the contents presented in multimodal structures and preferring multimodal structures).…”
Section: Data Collection Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…337 students were chosen via convenience sampling for this study which was designed on the basis of relational survey model. The data which is needed to answer the relevant questions in our study was collected by means of Multimodal Literacy Scale (Bulut, Ulu and Kan, 2015) and Critical Reading Self-Sufficiency Perception Scale (Karadeniz, 2014). The analyses of the data collected were conducted through Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient analysis technique and multiple regression analysis technique.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The related literature shows that the data collection instruments developed in order to determine visual literacy levels of individuals often measure this construct in self-report format (Arslan & Nalinci, 2014;Bulut, Ulu & Kan, 2015;Kiper, Arslan, Kıyıcı & Akgün, 2012;Özsevgeç, Akbulut & Özsevgeç, 2010;Şahin & Kıran, 2009;Yeh & Cheng, 2009). Many studies conducted in Turkey by collecting data in self-report format revealed high levels of visual literacy perception levels (Kocaarslan & Çeliktürk, 2013;Mert, 2017;Özsevgeç, et.al., 2014;Şahin & Kıran, 2009;Taşpınar, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the writers wanted to identify the level of students' multimodal literacy in digital fiction writing and the lecturers' view on the multimodal literacy. This investigation of multimodal literacy level was firstly introduced by Bulut et al (2015), who also created an instrument to measure it. According to them, teachers must have multimodal literacy skills to keep up with evolving technology as part of their teacher training.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study was conducted both quantitatively and qualitatively and involved 71 EFL students who took creative writing subject in an English education program in one state university in South Sumatera. The data were collected by distributing a questionnaire from Bulut et al (2015) and by interviewing 3 lecturers who taught the subject. Descriptive statistics and one-way ANOVA were used to determine mean, standard deviation and differences in terms of gender and classes with different lecturer; qualitative data were thematically analyzed to categorize the themes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%