2019
DOI: 10.3390/jcm8091409
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multimodal Imaging Assessment of Vascular and Neurodegenerative Retinal Alterations in Type 1 Diabetic Patients without Fundoscopic Signs of Diabetic Retinopathy

Abstract: The aim of this cross-sectional case-control study is to investigate the possible presence of vascular/neurodegenerative alterations in the retina of type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) patients without diabetic retinopathy (DR). Thirty-four eyes of 34 consecutive T1DM without DR (mean age 21 ± 2 years) were included. Another cohort of 27 eyes (27 healthy control subjects matched with age and sex) was also recruited. All patients underwent multimodal imaging evaluation using structural optical coherence tomography… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
22
0
4

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
3
22
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results are supported by previous findings of preclinical structural and functional changes in patients with diabetes. [16][17][18][19]37,39 The altered retinal vascular response that we observed also corroborates previous evidence on the importance of neurovascular coupling dysfunction very early in DR development. These studies used the laser Doppler blood flowmeter, functional magnetic resonance imaging, flicker electroretinography and the dynamic vessel analyzer as devices to assess retinal vascular function.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results are supported by previous findings of preclinical structural and functional changes in patients with diabetes. [16][17][18][19]37,39 The altered retinal vascular response that we observed also corroborates previous evidence on the importance of neurovascular coupling dysfunction very early in DR development. These studies used the laser Doppler blood flowmeter, functional magnetic resonance imaging, flicker electroretinography and the dynamic vessel analyzer as devices to assess retinal vascular function.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…By examining serial images over time, the generated final image clearly defines retinal vascular plexuses. [10][11][12][13][14] Recently, a few studies using OCTA have been reporting structural quantitative changes (i.e., reduced vessel density and increased foveal avascular zone area) in patients with diabetes before clinically evident DR. [15][16][17][18][19][20] However, little is known about the possibility of using OCTA to evaluate individual functional retinal vascular changes. Our group recently published a safe, reproducible and inexpensive protocol to assess retinal microvasculature reactivity in healthy subjects, detailing how OCTA technology is able to detect retinal vasodilation and vasoconstriction in response to two physiological conditions-mild hypoxia and isometric exercise, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carnevali et al showed in a small series of 25 eyes that OCTA was able to detect early vascular alterations even without any biomicroscopic signs of DR. 24 More recently, Sacconi et al described a series of 34 eyes where the only OCTA parameter that was significantly different in patients with type 1 DM compared to controls was the PD of the DCP, without differences in the rest of the studied parameters and plexuses. 25 The largest series in type 1 DM have been described in children, and they interestingly have shown controversial results. 26 30 Golebiewska et al reported that no differences were seen in the VD or FAZ area in any of the studied plexuses between patients with type 1 DM and controls ( n = 188 vs. 60); however, Niestrata-Ortiz et al described that FAZ area was different between diabetic and healthy children ( n = 112 vs. 30).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microperimetry. Assessment of retinal sensitivity was performed using microperimetry following the same procedure used in a previously published paper 21 . In detail, before the examination, all patients underwent at least 5 mm pupil dilation with 1% tropicamide and 15-minute mesopic adaptation.…”
Section: Oct-a Image Acquisition and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%