2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2022
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.02005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multimodal Dynamics: Dynamical Fusion for Trustworthy Multimodal Classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A total of fourteen computational methods are compared, encompassing six single-omics classifiers that employ early integration (K-nearest neighbors (KNN) 37 , support vector machine (SVM) 38 , Lasso 39 , random forest (RF) 40 , eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGboost) 41 , and fully connected neural networks (NN) 42 ), and seven multi-omics classifiers including group-regularized ridge regression 43 , BPLSDA that projects data to latent structures with discriminant analysis 44 , block PLSDA with additional sparse constraints (BSPLSDA) 44 , concatenation of final representations (CF) that concatenates late-stage multi-omics representations 45, 46 , gated multimodal fusion (GMU) that implements fusion with intermediate representation 47 , and two state-of-the-art methods (Mogonet 22 and Dynamic 30 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A total of fourteen computational methods are compared, encompassing six single-omics classifiers that employ early integration (K-nearest neighbors (KNN) 37 , support vector machine (SVM) 38 , Lasso 39 , random forest (RF) 40 , eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGboost) 41 , and fully connected neural networks (NN) 42 ), and seven multi-omics classifiers including group-regularized ridge regression 43 , BPLSDA that projects data to latent structures with discriminant analysis 44 , block PLSDA with additional sparse constraints (BSPLSDA) 44 , concatenation of final representations (CF) that concatenates late-stage multi-omics representations 45, 46 , gated multimodal fusion (GMU) that implements fusion with intermediate representation 47 , and two state-of-the-art methods (Mogonet 22 and Dynamic 30 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, the decision-making process for each omics data should be transparent and provide feedback for its own predictions. Consequently, we introduce a confidence-adaptive technique capable of delivering more accurate predictions 30, 34 , addressing the aforementioned challenges and facilitating a more effective integration of multi-omics data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The predicted location p r is an 8-dimensional probability vector, with each element representing whether the corresponding patch is masked. Here, we can employ the 0 loss function [26] for location prediction task, which counts nonzero elements in p r , defined as:…”
Section: Patch-masking Perceptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feature-level self-attention. Inspired by Han et al 9 , we employ the self-attention component for featurelevel feature selection and omics-level feature selection. Though sparsity of the high-dimensional data enables a high-level feature embedding, the informativeness of different features among different subjects are more important for multi-omics integration 30 .…”
Section: Self-attention Based Dynamical Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%