Anais De XXXVIII Simpósio Brasileiro De Telecomunicações E Processamento De Sinais 2020
DOI: 10.14209/sbrt.2020.1570661615
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MultiModal Dataset for Machine Learning Applied to Telecommunications

Abstract: Gathering channel data to test telecommunication systems is an essential step to guarantee the quality of the product. However, it can be a slow process and demand a considerable amount of effort and investment since it is costly to make field measurements of mmWaves. Having a ready dataset at disposal make things way faster and cheaper, allowing a developer to focus on more specific tasks. This paper presents an entire multimodal dataset with different kinds of information like channel communication, urban tr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The input to this network are features Θ t,1 extracted from a LIDAR simulator for two plots. The other two plots are obtained with a distinct NN architecture, which uses multimodal (MM) data (LIDAR, position, and images) as inputs [7]. Each of these two architectures were used with two distinct versions of the s008 dataset: one with the new and correct orientation (CO), while the other antenna arrays had a fixed orientation (FO) regardless any vehicle rotation.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The input to this network are features Θ t,1 extracted from a LIDAR simulator for two plots. The other two plots are obtained with a distinct NN architecture, which uses multimodal (MM) data (LIDAR, position, and images) as inputs [7]. Each of these two architectures were used with two distinct versions of the s008 dataset: one with the new and correct orientation (CO), while the other antenna arrays had a fixed orientation (FO) regardless any vehicle rotation.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, P = 1 was adopted in [6], which assumed the raw data from a LI-DAR sensor was converted to features Θ t,1 . In [7], P = 3 distinct feature modalities were adopted: Θ t,1 with positions from a GNSS (GPS) receiver, Θ t,2 with resampled images from RGB cameras and Θ t,3 with features from LIDAR [8].…”
Section: Caviar Simulation Requirementsmentioning
confidence: 99%