2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-15892-6_21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multimodal Backchannels for Embodied Conversational Agents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Inspired by these developments, a number of recent systems use vocal cues to trigger the behaviour of virtual agents. For example, in (Bevacqua et al, 2010) vocal cues are used to generate backchannels (i.e., non-intrusive signals provided during the speaker's turn). Acosta and Ward proposed a system that uses speech and prosody variation to build rapport between human and agent (Acosta and Ward, 2011), and Cavazza et al used vocal signals for character-based interactive storytelling (Cavazza et al, 2009).…”
Section: Emotions In Vocal Signalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inspired by these developments, a number of recent systems use vocal cues to trigger the behaviour of virtual agents. For example, in (Bevacqua et al, 2010) vocal cues are used to generate backchannels (i.e., non-intrusive signals provided during the speaker's turn). Acosta and Ward proposed a system that uses speech and prosody variation to build rapport between human and agent (Acosta and Ward, 2011), and Cavazza et al used vocal signals for character-based interactive storytelling (Cavazza et al, 2009).…”
Section: Emotions In Vocal Signalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We therefore expect that a different type of backchannel, produced in the same structural context, will be perceived differently by human observers. Although some researchers have addressed the perception of different types of backchannels [22,23] in isolation, none of them have investigated their perception in a conversational context. Therefore, in this paper, we investigate how the quantity, type and timing of backchannels influences how human-like the backchannel behavior is perceived by human observers.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To solve this problem, a number of models have been proposed for determining the appropriate timing of feedback (ranging from rules-based to complex machine learning approaches, e.g., [25,17]) and for turning different feedback functions into nonverbal as well as vocal and linguistic behaviour [24,22,5]. Less attention has been paid to the question which feedback function to use (exceptions being [12,14,4]), mainly due to the open challenge of understanding unrestricted spoken language in large domains, which would lead agents to give frequent and less informative signals of non-understanding.…”
Section: Communicative Feedback In Human-agent Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers in the virtual agents community have noticed the importance of these mechanisms and have started to develop systems that act as 'active listeners', i.e., agents that produce feedback signals in response to user actions [12,14,17,4,5]. In contrast to this, the at least equally important capability of being able to perceive, interpret, and respond to communicative user feedback is effectively non-existent in conversational virtual agents (but see [19] for a first effort).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%