2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10514-018-9733-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multimodal anomaly detection for assistive robots

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We control its sensitivity by adjusting the number of support vectors. • HMM-GP: A likelihood-based classifier using an HMM introduced in [32]. We vary the likelihood threshold with respect to the distribution of hidden states.…”
Section: E Baseline Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We control its sensitivity by adjusting the number of support vectors. • HMM-GP: A likelihood-based classifier using an HMM introduced in [32]. We vary the likelihood threshold with respect to the distribution of hidden states.…”
Section: E Baseline Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used data from 1,555 feeding executions collected from 24 able-bodied participants where we newly collected 1,203 non-anomalous feeding executions for this work. 16 participants were male and 8 were female, and the age range was [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35]. We conducted the studies with approval from the Georgia Tech Institutional Review Board (IRB).…”
Section: B Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A workshop publication described an early, less-capable version of the meal-assistance system that required fiducial markers placed on the person's head and the bowl [28]. Otherwise, our publications involving meal-assistance have focused on execution monitoring [29,15,30,16]. The newer meal-assistance system that we present now was used in a conference paper [15] to evaluate an execution monitoring system, but the paper provided no details about the meal-assistance system.…”
Section: Our Prior Work On Robot-assisted Feedingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This process can produce large errors due to the noise in the depth data and poor timesynchronization between the RGB and depth images. Thus, our Figure 11: Overview of the multimodal execution monitor, which estimates the task execution state, detect an anomaly [30], and classify the cause of the anomaly [15] for safe feeding assistance.…”
Section: ψ(X) (4)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Out the system intrusion event. Park et al [11][12][13] carried out an online anomaly monitoring method based on multi-modal sensory signals fusion during robot manipulation, where a parametric HMM (Left-to-right HMM) models a multi-modal time series of a robot performing normal motions, and proposes abnormal thresholds that change by the execution progress to achieve abnormal monitoring. We extend the HMM for anomaly monitoring in the subsequent part of this chapter that inspired by the HMM cases.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%