2022
DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c02917
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multimodal and Multicolor Anti-counterfeiting Realized in CaCd2Ga2Ge3O12 with a Single Activator of Mn2+

Abstract: The continuously growing significance of information security and authentication has put forward many new requirements and challenges for modern luminescent materials and anti-counterfeiting technologies. Recently, luminescent materials have attracted much attention in this field owing to their legibility, repeatability, multicolor, and multiple stimuli-responsive nature. In this work, the efficient multicolor and multimodal luminescence material CaCd2Ga2Ge3O12:Mn2+ was successfully designed and synthesized us… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…29–31 Notably, the radii difference percentage allowance between the doped and substituted ions must be within 30% according to a report by Davolos. 32,33 Meanwhile, the radii difference percentage can be calculated approximately using the following equation:where R m (CN) and R d (CN) represent the radii of the host cation and the doped ion, respectively. Based on Cd 2+ ( r = 1.1 Å, CN = 8), Ga1 3+ ( r = 0.62 Å, CN = 6), Ga2 3+ ( r = 0.47 Å, CN = 4), Ge1 4+ ( r = 0.53 Å, CN = 6), Ge2 4+ ( r = 0.39 Å, CN = 4), Pr 3+ ( r = 1.126 Å, CN = 8), the Dr between Pr 3+ and the host cations are −2.36%, −81.61%, −139.57%, −112.45% and −188.72% for Cd 2+ , Ga1 3+ , Ga2 3+ , Ge1 4+ and Ge2 4+ , respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…29–31 Notably, the radii difference percentage allowance between the doped and substituted ions must be within 30% according to a report by Davolos. 32,33 Meanwhile, the radii difference percentage can be calculated approximately using the following equation:where R m (CN) and R d (CN) represent the radii of the host cation and the doped ion, respectively. Based on Cd 2+ ( r = 1.1 Å, CN = 8), Ga1 3+ ( r = 0.62 Å, CN = 6), Ga2 3+ ( r = 0.47 Å, CN = 4), Ge1 4+ ( r = 0.53 Å, CN = 6), Ge2 4+ ( r = 0.39 Å, CN = 4), Pr 3+ ( r = 1.126 Å, CN = 8), the Dr between Pr 3+ and the host cations are −2.36%, −81.61%, −139.57%, −112.45% and −188.72% for Cd 2+ , Ga1 3+ , Ga2 3+ , Ge1 4+ and Ge2 4+ , respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4(c) depicts the corresponding HRTEM image, in which the d-spacing corresponding to (420) of CGGO: 0.0015Pr 3+ is calculated to be 0.271 nm. 32,35 As shown in Fig. 4(d-i), the CGGO:0.0015Pr 3+ sample contains five elements of Cd, O, Ge, Pr, and Ga, which are all uniformly distributed in the particles.…”
Section: Phase and Crystal Structure Identificationmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…11,22,25,32,33 It is to be noted that the radii difference percentage allowance between the doped and substituted ions must be within 30% according to the report of Davolos. 21,34 Moreover, we can calculate the radii difference percentage using the following equation:where R m (CN) and R d (CN) represent the radii of the host cation and the doped ion, respectively. Considering Ca 2+ ( r = 1.12 Å, CN = 8), Cd 2+ ( r = 1.1 Å, CN = 8), Ga1 3+ ( r = 0.62 Å, CN = 6), Ga2 3+ ( r = 0.47 Å, CN = 4), Ge1 4+ ( r = 0.53 Å, CN = 6), Ge2 4+ ( r = 0.39 Å, CN = 4), and Pr 3+ ( r = 1.126 Å, CN = 8), the D r between Pr 3+ and the host cations are −0.54%, −2.36%, −81.61%, −139.57%, −112.45% and −188.72% for Ca 2+ , Cd 2+ , Ga1 3+ , Ga2 3+ , Ge1 4+ and Ge2 4+ , respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 And the matrix has an adjustable band gap and abundant defect energy levels, which is conducive to the realization of super strong afterglow. 11,21 Furthermore, host materials with an excellent garnet structure have a stable lattice and have attracted considerable attention. 4,22–24 Pr 3+ is a prominent and excellent activator and can exhibit a strong red emission band at 613 nm attributed to the 1 D 2 → 3 H 4 transition of the Pr 3+ ion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%